2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.marstruc.2004.08.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Opportunities to improve the operational and technical management of jack-up deployments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The frequency of offshore incidents during installation near footprints has increased by a factor of four between the period 1979~1988 and 1996~2006 (Osborne 2005) and at an even higher rate over 2005~2012 (Jack et al 2013). Examples of incidents include (a) leg damage Perforation drilling for easing spudcan-footprint interaction issues Hossain & Stainforth Submitted January 2015, Revised November 2015 3 to the Mod V class Monitor and jack-up platforms in the Central North Sea (Hunt and Marsh 2004); (b) an exceptionally high RPD reading in the Starboard leg of a jack-up rig due to sliding towards the footprint (Handidjaja et al 2009); (c) some sliding was experienced by a rig installation as the legs were installed owing to the significantly different leg spacing from the previously installed L780-C Mod II unit (Brennan et al 2006).…”
Section: 'Mobile' Jack-up Rig and Spudcan-footprint Interaction Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The frequency of offshore incidents during installation near footprints has increased by a factor of four between the period 1979~1988 and 1996~2006 (Osborne 2005) and at an even higher rate over 2005~2012 (Jack et al 2013). Examples of incidents include (a) leg damage Perforation drilling for easing spudcan-footprint interaction issues Hossain & Stainforth Submitted January 2015, Revised November 2015 3 to the Mod V class Monitor and jack-up platforms in the Central North Sea (Hunt and Marsh 2004); (b) an exceptionally high RPD reading in the Starboard leg of a jack-up rig due to sliding towards the footprint (Handidjaja et al 2009); (c) some sliding was experienced by a rig installation as the legs were installed owing to the significantly different leg spacing from the previously installed L780-C Mod II unit (Brennan et al 2006).…”
Section: 'Mobile' Jack-up Rig and Spudcan-footprint Interaction Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Soil conditions of a thin layer of sand overlying a weaker stratum of clay are still proving hazardous during the installation of mobile jack-up platforms, with unexpected 'punch-through' failures continuing to be prevalent today (Hunt & Marsh, 2004). In spite of this awareness, assessment of spudcan penetration in sand over clay conditions is still based on methods developed from small-scale (laboratory floor) experiments of a size of footing that is much smaller than that of a modern day jack-up, which can exceed 20 m in diameter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accident rates due to the effects of vibration and structural deficiencies remain comparatively high, making an accurate analysis of jack-up behaviors increasingly important. Recent attention has focused on understanding the behaviors of offshore platforms under dynamic loading conditions [4]. Jack-up platforms are flexible structures built to have natural periods of the same order as the predominant wave periods for many seas, which are designed based on structural modeling of the legs, analysis of the degree of flexibility provided by the spudcan, and assessment of the nature of the wave loads [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%