Opportunities to encourage mobilization of sustainable bioenergy supply chains

Abstract

Significant opportunities exist to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, increase domestic energy security, boost rural economies, and improve local environmental conditions through the deployment of sustainable bioenergy and bio‐based product supply chains. There is currently a wide selection of possible feedstocks, a variety of conversion routes, and a number of different end products that can be produced at a range of scales. However, economic slowdown, low oil prices, lack of global political will, and lingering questions regarding land use change and the sustainability of bioenergy production systems provide a challenging global context to speed the pace of investment. The opinions expressed in this paper are derived from our collaboration within IEA Bioenergy to determine opportunities as well as barriers that need to be overcome to realize opportunities on a wider scale. This comprehensive and novel collaborative effort confirmed that feedstocks produced using logistically efficient production systems can be mobilized to make significant contributions to achieving global targets for bioenergy. At the same time, significant barriers to large‐scale implementation exist in many regions. The mobilization potential identified in the study will depend on both increases in supply chain efficiencies and profits and strong policy support to increase stakeholder and investor confidence. WIREs Energy Environ 2017, 6:e237. doi: 10.1002/wene.237 This article is categorized under: Bioenergy > Economics and Policy Energy Policy and Planning > Climate and Environment

Lignocellulosic biomass for chemicals and energy: an integrated assessment of future EU market sizes, feedstock availability impacts, synergy and competition effects, and path dependencies

“…This role of feedstock is an important element specific to biobased options compared with other renewable resources, as most generic support schemes for renewables (such as feed‐in subsidies and quota obligations) only provide a market stimulus at the end of the chain. For biobased options, additional support in other parts of the supply chain will improve effectiveness, as was also qualitatively indicated by Smith et al …”

On the global limits of bioenergy and land use for climate change mitigation

“…International trade of bioenergy has increased, and hence, liquid biofuels and more recently also biomass pellets are emerging commodities, as a result of policies being revised in some countries. More countries concomitantly supplying and demanding bioenergy globally could increase the resilience of the overall system and energy security, as countries learn from the collective experiences (Geels et al ., ) and enact more integrative policies, for instance, by combining results from integrated assessment models with insights from sociotechnical transition analysis and practice‐based action research, learning by doing (Smith et al ., ).…”

A spatially explicit approach to modeling biological productivity and economic attractiveness of short-rotation woody crops in the eastern USA

“…Transitioning to a biobased economy will not be free of costs [7,15], however, requiring that choices be made among policies that benefit different groups (e.g., [23,45,72]). Nevertheless, overcoming obstacles to the transition will require efficient and profitable supply chains and a supportive policy environment [79].…”

“…Despite the strategic clarity gained by these national analyses, many tactical questions remain including feedstock species and yields, production costs, logistical operations, processing and conversion technologies, and environmental sustainability [79]. Biomass feedstocks are diverse, comprising the plant and algal materials of various origins from green to waste material [24].…”