Opportunities and Recommendations for Improving Medication Safety: Understanding the Medication Management System in Primary Care Through an Abstraction Hierarchy
Abstract:Background
Despite making great strides in improving the treatment of diseases, the minimization of unintended harm by medication therapy continues to be a major hurdle facing the health care system. Medication error and prescription of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) represent a prevalent source of harm to patients and are associated with increased rates of adverse events, hospitalizations, and increased health care costs. Attempts to improve medication management systems in primary c… Show more
“…However, our results might not be directly transferable, as primary care medication management constitutes a complex health care system. It encompasses different types of healthcare organisation (e.g., home care, care homes and general practices) and health care providers (e.g., nurses, pharmacists and GPs) 42 . Furthermore, both private and public stakeholders exist in most countries and may be highly dissimilar in their organisation and available resources.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It encompasses different types of healthcare organisation (e.g., home care, care homes and general practices) and health care providers (e.g., nurses, pharmacists and GPs). 42 Furthermore, both private and public stakeholders exist in most countries and may be highly dissimilar in their organisation and available resources. Thus, the specific context, in which the intervention is to be implemented, should be fully considered, as adaptions may be needed to achieve success and sustainability.…”
Section: Primary Care As a Setting For Deprescribingmentioning
Medication reviews focusing on deprescribing can reduce potentially inappropriate medication; however, evidence regarding effects on health‐related outcomes is sparse. In a real‐life quality improvement project using a newly developed chronic care model, we investigated how a general practitioner‐led medication review intervention focusing on deprescribing affected health‐related outcomes. We performed a before–after intervention study including care home residents and community‐dwelling patients affiliated with a large Danish general practice. The primary outcomes were changes in self‐reported health status, general condition and functional level from baseline to 3–4 months follow‐up. Of the 105 included patients, 87 completed the follow‐up. From baseline to follow‐up, 255 medication changes were made, of which 83% were deprescribing. Mean self‐reported health status increased (0.55 [95% CI: 0.22 to 0.87]); the proportion with general condition rated as ‘average or above’ was stable (0.06 [95% CI: −0.02 to 0.14]); and the proportion with functional level ‘without any disability’ was stable (−0.05 [95% CI: −0.09 to 0.001]). In conclusion, this general practitioner‐led medication review intervention was associated with deprescribing and increased self‐reported health status without the deterioration of general condition or functional level in real‐life primary care patients. The results should be interpreted carefully given the small sample size and lack of control group.
“…However, our results might not be directly transferable, as primary care medication management constitutes a complex health care system. It encompasses different types of healthcare organisation (e.g., home care, care homes and general practices) and health care providers (e.g., nurses, pharmacists and GPs) 42 . Furthermore, both private and public stakeholders exist in most countries and may be highly dissimilar in their organisation and available resources.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It encompasses different types of healthcare organisation (e.g., home care, care homes and general practices) and health care providers (e.g., nurses, pharmacists and GPs). 42 Furthermore, both private and public stakeholders exist in most countries and may be highly dissimilar in their organisation and available resources. Thus, the specific context, in which the intervention is to be implemented, should be fully considered, as adaptions may be needed to achieve success and sustainability.…”
Section: Primary Care As a Setting For Deprescribingmentioning
Medication reviews focusing on deprescribing can reduce potentially inappropriate medication; however, evidence regarding effects on health‐related outcomes is sparse. In a real‐life quality improvement project using a newly developed chronic care model, we investigated how a general practitioner‐led medication review intervention focusing on deprescribing affected health‐related outcomes. We performed a before–after intervention study including care home residents and community‐dwelling patients affiliated with a large Danish general practice. The primary outcomes were changes in self‐reported health status, general condition and functional level from baseline to 3–4 months follow‐up. Of the 105 included patients, 87 completed the follow‐up. From baseline to follow‐up, 255 medication changes were made, of which 83% were deprescribing. Mean self‐reported health status increased (0.55 [95% CI: 0.22 to 0.87]); the proportion with general condition rated as ‘average or above’ was stable (0.06 [95% CI: −0.02 to 0.14]); and the proportion with functional level ‘without any disability’ was stable (−0.05 [95% CI: −0.09 to 0.001]). In conclusion, this general practitioner‐led medication review intervention was associated with deprescribing and increased self‐reported health status without the deterioration of general condition or functional level in real‐life primary care patients. The results should be interpreted carefully given the small sample size and lack of control group.
“…The AH is unique in that the patient's contextual factors and SDOH are included as a boundary of the system. For example, St-Maurice and Burns (2017) developed an AH bounded by activities within the clinician's control with the assistance of electronic medical records (EMRs), while Baumgartner et al (2020) developed an AH to model medication management in a primary care office, rather than overall treatment management. Furthermore, previous work modeling patient systems include the patient's biomedical systems and environment, but typically do not include contextual factors.…”
Social determinants of health (SDOH) and other contextual factors influence a patient’s ability to adhere to a plan of care. Providers must understand these factors in order to develop treatment plans which best meet patient needs and preferences. This is particularly important for patients with type 2 diabetes, which is primarily managed by the patient. Abstraction hierarchy is a modeling technique from the cognitive work analysis framework which describes system components at multiple levels of abstraction. This study seeks to examine SDOH as they relate to type 2 diabetes management by the patient and activities carried out by the primary care provider to incorporate these factors into the medical decision-making process. The abstraction hierarchy was developed based on previous literature and interviews with patients and primary care medical personnel. The resulting abstraction hierarchy can be used to inform future screening tools and patient-centered care interventions for addressing SDOH for patients with type 2 diabetes.
“…However, our results might not be directly transferable, as primary care medication management constitutes a complex health care system. It encompasses different types of healthcare organization (e.g., home care, care homes, general practices) and health care providers (e.g., nurses, pharmacists, GPs) 36 . Furthermore, both private and public stakeholders exist in most countries and may be highly dissimilar in their organization and available resources.…”
Section: Primary Care As a Setting For Deprescribingmentioning
Medication reviews focusing on deprescribing can reduce potentially
inappropriate medication; however, evidence regarding the effects on
health-related outcomes is scares. In a real-life, quality improvement
project, we aimed to investigate how a general practitioner-led
medication review intervention with focus on deprescribing affected
health-related outcomes. We performed a before-after intervention study
including care home residents and community-dwelling patients affiliated
with a large Danish general practice. The primary outcomes were changes
in self-reported health status, general condition, and functional level
from baseline to 3-4 months follow-up. Of 105 included patients, 87
completed follow-up. From baseline to follow-up, 255 medication changes
were made, of which 83% were deprescribing. Mean self-reported health
status increased from 7.3 to 7.9 (0.6 [95% CI: 0.2 to 0.9]); the
proportion of patients with general condition rated as “average or
above” was stable (74.7% to 80.5% (5.7% [95% CI: -3.4 to
14.9]); and the proportion of patients with functional level “without
any disability” was stable (58.6% to 54.0% (-4.6% [95% CI: -10.1
to 1.0]). In conclusion, this general practitioner-led medication
review intervention led to deprescribing and increased self-reported
health status without deterioration of general condition or functional
level in real-life primary care patients.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.