2015
DOI: 10.1111/modl.12271
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Opportunities and Outcomes: The Role of Peers in Developing the Oral Academic English Proficiency of Adolescent English Learners

Abstract: Although researchers often acknowledge the importance of linguistically rich interactions in the academic language development of emergent bilingual students, few studies have explicitly examined the role of linguistic peer support and the underlying structure of social relationships in the second language learning experiences and outcomes of immigrant adolescents in schooling contexts. This mixed methods study investigates the role of peers-including bilingual peers-in the development of oral academic English… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Crosslanguage-status relationships, on the other hand, may be valuable to EL students as a source of interaction with experienced English speakers that supports the development of language skills necessary for school success (Haneda & Wells, 2008;Valdés, 2004). Consistent with this, Carhill-Poza (2015) found that among Spanish-speaking immigrant students, time spent speaking English with peers was a significant predictor of their standardized assessed English proficiency levels. While theory and evidence underscore the potential for bridging and bonding peer relationships to be leveraged for language acquisition and academic growth, there is limited work exploring how particular classroom conditions may foster or hinder these different types of relationships.…”
Section: Power Of Peersmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Crosslanguage-status relationships, on the other hand, may be valuable to EL students as a source of interaction with experienced English speakers that supports the development of language skills necessary for school success (Haneda & Wells, 2008;Valdés, 2004). Consistent with this, Carhill-Poza (2015) found that among Spanish-speaking immigrant students, time spent speaking English with peers was a significant predictor of their standardized assessed English proficiency levels. While theory and evidence underscore the potential for bridging and bonding peer relationships to be leveraged for language acquisition and academic growth, there is limited work exploring how particular classroom conditions may foster or hinder these different types of relationships.…”
Section: Power Of Peersmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Institutional mechanisms in U.S. schools that sort students into courses or academic tracks according to assessed language proficiency often further limit students’ access to peers who are linguistically different from themselves (e.g., Kibler & Valdés, 2016; Valdés, 2001). And while social and academic connections with other language learners can provide space for learning and shared struggle without “competition from native speakers” (García & Bartlett, 2007, p. 6), interaction with English-dominant or bi/multilingual peers is also important, both as a key resource for access and exposure to how English is used in the context of U.S. education (e.g., Carhill-Poza, 2011, 2015; Hawkins, 2004; Valdés, 2004), and as a source of connectedness to classmates that facilitates greater school engagement (e.g., Benner, 2011; Tsai, 2006). Because cross-language peer relationships often also cross racial/ethnic boundaries, findings from this body of research are relevant to the current study, and there is evidence that relationships both within and across racial/ethnic groups provide unique benefits to all involved.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our study is informed by a vibrant body of research that has demonstrated the importance of peer interactions especially among adolescent multilingual students (Carhill‐Poza, 2015, 2018; Kibler et al, 2018; Kibler, Atteberry, Hardigree, & Salerno, 2015; King, Bigelow, & Hirsi, 2017; Martin‐Beltrán, 2013, 2014). This body of work has largely focused on adolescents who are classified as English learners (ELs), although these scholars are critical of terminology that perpetuates deficit orientations (Kibler & Valdés, 2016).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This critical work sheds light on the importance of interactions among culturally and linguistically diverse (CLD) adolescents but has rarely focused on HLLs as a distinct population (Valdés, 2005). Prior research has shown how adolescent peer interactions can offer expanded opportunities to engage a wider linguistic repertoire and how using languages other than English (LOTEs) affords opportunities to develop English (e.g., Carhill‐Poza, 2015, 2018). Rather than focus on English development, our current study seeks to understand how CLD adolescents also engage and develop LOTEs.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%