2015
DOI: 10.1111/mec.13277
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Opportunities and challenges of next‐generation sequencing applications in ecological epigenetics

Abstract: Evolutionary theory posits that adaptation can result when populations harbour heritable phenotypic variation for traits that increase tolerance to local conditions. However, the actual mechanisms that underlie heritable phenotypic variation are not completely understood (Keller ). Recently, the potential role of epigenetic mechanisms in the process of adaptive evolution has been the subject of much debate (Pigliucci & Finkelman ). Studies of variation in DNA methylation in particular have shown that natural p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is necessary to conduct transplantation or common garden experiments with offspring from populations in different habitats to distinguish the contribution of induced and inherited epigenetic variation to adaptive phenotypes. As the MSAP marker only provides limited anonymous loci that are difficult to link to functional genomic elements or phenotype, a reduced representation bisulfite sequencing approach based on next‐generation sequencing methods is the next level of epigenetic study in natural populations (Gugger et al., ; Platt et al., ; Robertson & Richards, ; Trucchi et al., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is necessary to conduct transplantation or common garden experiments with offspring from populations in different habitats to distinguish the contribution of induced and inherited epigenetic variation to adaptive phenotypes. As the MSAP marker only provides limited anonymous loci that are difficult to link to functional genomic elements or phenotype, a reduced representation bisulfite sequencing approach based on next‐generation sequencing methods is the next level of epigenetic study in natural populations (Gugger et al., ; Platt et al., ; Robertson & Richards, ; Trucchi et al., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In future studies, a reduced‐representation bisulfite sequencing approach would allow the direct comparison of genetic and epigenetic data sets, and at a much finer scale, with substantially increased statistical power to detect epigenetic differences between populations (van Gurp et al., 2016; Robertson & Richards, 2015; Schrey et al., 2013; Trucchi et al., 2016). In addition, sequencing‐based methods provide an increased ability to disentangle the relationship of methylation variation and gene function when fragments overlap with the promoters or coding regions of genes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, sequencing‐based methods provide an increased ability to disentangle the relationship of methylation variation and gene function when fragments overlap with the promoters or coding regions of genes. By increasing the number of loci surveyed, future studies may better identify the environmental conditions under which genetic or epigenetic variation is associated with environmental cues (Robertson & Richards, 2015). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This would, however, contrast results of an earlier study on the same species in which a strong relation between DNA methylation and phenotypic variation was revealed (Vergeer et al., ). Moreover, it is widely accepted that epigenetic variation may significantly affect phenotypic variation (Bossdorf et al., ; Cortijo et al., ; Cubas et al., ; Johannes et al., ; Zhang, Fischer, Colot, & Bossdorf, ), although how exactly gene expression and phenotype are influenced by DNA methylation, it is not entirely understood and often no obvious connection between phenotype, gene expression and DNA methylation is observed (Robertson & Richards, ; Schrey et al., ). In this study, AFLP and MS‐AFLP methods were used to analyze genetic and epigenetic variation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, AFLP and MS-AFLP methods were used to analyze genetic and epigenetic variation. Although these methods have proven to be useful methods to analyze overall correlations between genetic, epigenetic and phenotypic relatedness, they are not suitable to uncover functionality or direct links between phenotypic and genetic or epigenetic variation (Robertson & Richards, 2015b;Schrey et al, 2013). In order to pinpoint the mechanic link between methylation and phenotype, other in-depth methods such as next-generation sequencing are necessary (van Gurp et al, 2016;Robertson & Richards, 2015b;Schrey et al, 2013).…”
Section: Correlation Between Phenotype Genetic and Epigenetic Varmentioning
confidence: 99%