2015
DOI: 10.15403/jgld.2014.1121.242.buch
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Opportunistic Colorectal Cancer Screening using Colonoscopy. Comparative Results between two Historical Cohorts in Bucharest, Romania

Abstract: Background & Aims: Even though Romania has one of the highest incidence and mortality in colorectal cancer (CRC) in Europe, there is currently no organized screening program. We aimed to assess the results of our opportunistic CRC screening using colonoscopy.Methods: A single center retrospective study to include all opportunistic screening colonoscopies performed in two 18 month periods (2007-2008 and 2012-2013) was designed. All asymptomatic individuals without a personal or family history of adenoma or … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most common reason for excluding full-text articles was that higher-than-averagerisk individuals were included in the study, such as those with a family history of CRC or symptoms prompting the colonoscopy examination. There were 17 total articles included with 51,811 individuals younger than 50 years [34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49] (Figure 1, Supplementary Table 2). Seven studies were from East Asia (4 from South Korea, 2 from Taiwan, and 1 from China), 5 from the United States, 3 from Europe (Romania, Germany, and Greece), and 2 from the Middle East (Israel and Iran).…”
Section: Search Strategy and Study Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The most common reason for excluding full-text articles was that higher-than-averagerisk individuals were included in the study, such as those with a family history of CRC or symptoms prompting the colonoscopy examination. There were 17 total articles included with 51,811 individuals younger than 50 years [34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49] (Figure 1, Supplementary Table 2). Seven studies were from East Asia (4 from South Korea, 2 from Taiwan, and 1 from China), 5 from the United States, 3 from Europe (Romania, Germany, and Greece), and 2 from the Middle East (Israel and Iran).…”
Section: Search Strategy and Study Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meta-analysis was performed on additional age categories delineated as younger than 40 years, 37,45,48 40-44 years 37,40,43,45,48 and 45-49 years. [38][39][40]43,45,[47][48][49] Neoplasia outcomes were significantly different by age groups (c 2 ¼ 13.038; P ¼ .001).…”
Section: Yield Of Colonoscopy By Age Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is hypothesized that cells under the effect of mutagenic agents undergo DNA damage, failing to survive the cycle of cell division and thereby undergo a process of necrosis or apoptosis before the end of first division. 65 This may be the reason for the significant lower NDIs of the PC and the PCL/UCNPs-apatite eluate in the 100% concentration in comparison to the NC. There may also be an induction of mitotic delay which, by not permitting the repair of genotoxic lesions, will modify the number of cells entering mitosis by modifying the ratio of mono, bi-, tri-and tetranucleated cells.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In countries with a screening programme in place, participation rates range between 4.5% and 71.3% [11]. In countries without a screening programme, Eurostat surveys [13] shows high rates of individuals aged between 50 and 74 years that have never been screened for CRC: Bulgaria approximately 90%, Greece approximately 77%, Slovakia approximately 52%, and Romania approximately 95% [14][15][16]. The country rates should be carefully interpreted for two reasons, first information is self-reported by the patients, and second the numbers might be slightly dated as the Eurostat survey on colorectal cancer screening has not been updated since 2014.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%