2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.04.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Opportunism, governance structure and relational norms: An interactive perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
67
0
5

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
2
67
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, Paswan, Hirunyawipada, and Iyer () provide evidence supporting the arguments that greater mutual trust among parties, predictability and stability of rules and behaviors, and reciprocity, among others, contribute to reductions in partner opportunism. These corroborate closely with our deductions of the relational dynamics in Table .…”
mentioning
confidence: 80%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In particular, Paswan, Hirunyawipada, and Iyer () provide evidence supporting the arguments that greater mutual trust among parties, predictability and stability of rules and behaviors, and reciprocity, among others, contribute to reductions in partner opportunism. These corroborate closely with our deductions of the relational dynamics in Table .…”
mentioning
confidence: 80%
“…This would be countervailed by relational dynamics that encourage/enforce compliance, that is, there is effective interactive governance. Drawing on the seminal contributions of Jap and Anderson (2003), Cavusgil, Deligonul, and Zhang (2004), Caniëls and Gelderman (2010) and also Paswan, Hirunyawipada, and Iyer (2017), the degree of effective governance is inversely related to the extent of partner opportunism. 19 Table 3 amalgamates the analyses and arguments of the three study states, and evaluates the extent of opportunism between them.…”
Section: Measuring Governance Effectivenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Diante o exposto, as empresas na tentativa de reduzir os custos de transação, utilizamse de instrumentos gerenciais, de natureza contábil, para possibilitar a troca de informações de custos e outras informações relevantes para o relacionamento entre empresas colaboradoras, já que a empresa não é, todavia, autossuficiente, necessitando participar de relações de interdependência em diferentes níveis e formas (FEHR, 2015;LIU et al, 2017;PASWAN; HIRUNYAWIPADA; IYER, 2017).…”
Section: 1unclassified
“…Nessas circunstâncias, se por um lado os entrevistados também destacam a confiança mútua como uma das salvaguardas (sendo uma salvaguarda relacional) e é possível perceber pelas evidências que de fato foi construída confiança no relacionamento, por outro lado, verifica-se que a confiança é parcial. Isso porque mecanismos formais de salvaguardas entre as partes foram adotados, certamente pelo risco de comportamento oportunista (WILLIAMSON, 1991(WILLIAMSON, , 1993PASWAN;HIRUNYAWIPADA;IYER, 2017). Williamson (1996) corrobora ao defender que não existe confiança pura, e assim, as transações sempre terão algum tipo de salvaguarda.…”
Section: Incentivos Para O Compartilhamentounclassified