2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-26575-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Opponent vesicular transporters regulate the strength of glutamatergic neurotransmission in a C. elegans sensory circuit

Abstract: At chemical synapses, neurotransmitters are packaged into synaptic vesicles that release their contents in response to depolarization. Despite its central role in synaptic function, regulation of the machinery that loads vesicles with neurotransmitters remains poorly understood. We find that synaptic glutamate signaling in a C. elegans chemosensory circuit is regulated by antagonistic interactions between the canonical vesicular glutamate transporter EAT-4/VGLUT and another vesicular transporter, VST-1. Loss o… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…B) Inhibiting neuron-neuron synaptic transmission in VC causes increased activity (membrane depolarization) in HSN, suggesting inhibition of HSN dependent on synaptic transmission from VC (Kopchock et al 2021) (Table 4H, this manuscript). C) Model of the mechanisms involved in RIA activation based on data from Choi et al (2021) (Table 4J-4K). Blue boxes represent a GO cellular component term.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…B) Inhibiting neuron-neuron synaptic transmission in VC causes increased activity (membrane depolarization) in HSN, suggesting inhibition of HSN dependent on synaptic transmission from VC (Kopchock et al 2021) (Table 4H, this manuscript). C) Model of the mechanisms involved in RIA activation based on data from Choi et al (2021) (Table 4J-4K). Blue boxes represent a GO cellular component term.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this, the maximum background corrected fluorescence during stimulation was calculated (as a moving average of 1 s). If this was higher than the average background corrected fluorescence before the stimulation +3 × standard deviations (of background corrected fluorescence before stimulation; minimum of two arbitrary units of fluorescence increase), the animal was counted as a strong responder (adapted from Choi et al, 2021); see Supplementary Figure 6A for example traces that fit or do not fit these parameters; animals not fitting the cut-off showed no discernable light-evoked effect on DNC fluorescence. Also, animals that showed an increase of the fluorescence after the end of the stimulus, or animals showing spontaneous events, were excluded.…”
Section: Strainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, exposure to stimuli such as odors can be used. However, this is difficult to control, and limited to applications in sensory neurons (Choi et al, 2021). Thus, an all-optical solution that is not limited to certain cell types would be ideal, e.g., a combination of genetically encoded non-invasive tools for in vivo stimulation of neurons, and pH-sensitive fluorescent proteins.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this, the maximum background corrected fluorescence during stimulation was calculated (as a moving average of 1 s). If this was higher than the average background corrected fluorescence before the stimulation + 3 * standard deviation (of background corrected fluorescence before stimulation), the animal was counted as a strong responder (adapted from Choi et al, 2021); see Fig. S3A for example traces that fit or do not fit these parameters; animals not fitting the cut-off showed no discernable light-evoked effect on DNC fluorescence.…”
Section: Quantification Of Fluorescencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, exposure to stimuli such as odors can be used. Yet, this is difficult to control, and limited to applications in sensory neurons (Choi et al, 2021). Thus, an all-optical solution that is not limited to certain cell types would be ideal, e.g., involving a combination of genetically encoded non-invasive tools for in vivo stimulation of neurons, with pH-sensitive fluorescent proteins.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%