2019
DOI: 10.1177/0165551519827892
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

OPPCAT: Ontology population from tabular data

Abstract: In order to present large amount of information on the Web to both users and machines, it is urgently needed to structure Web data. E-commerce is one of the areas where increasing data bottlenecks on the Web inhibit data access. Ontological display of the product information enables better product comparison and search applications using the semantics of the product specifications and their corresponding values. In this article, we present a framework called OPPCAT, which is used for semi-automatic ontology po… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This structure, however, is rarely applicable to real-world spreadsheets [18]. Several approaches have tried to overcome this assumption by importing cells as separate entities or blocks [1923] or by adding semantic structure to the table [3,18,2426]. Systems for tabular data integration can be divided into four groups based on the table’s content-provided output [27]: (1) RDF graph (RDF 123, XLWrap, Google Refine); (2) OWL ontology instances (Anzo suit, MappingMaster); (3) any part of the Semantic Web environment, including RDF graph or ontology (TopBraid Composer); and (4) don’t convert data into RDF or OWL but provide a simple spreadsheet-like user interface (Populous).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This structure, however, is rarely applicable to real-world spreadsheets [18]. Several approaches have tried to overcome this assumption by importing cells as separate entities or blocks [1923] or by adding semantic structure to the table [3,18,2426]. Systems for tabular data integration can be divided into four groups based on the table’s content-provided output [27]: (1) RDF graph (RDF 123, XLWrap, Google Refine); (2) OWL ontology instances (Anzo suit, MappingMaster); (3) any part of the Semantic Web environment, including RDF graph or ontology (TopBraid Composer); and (4) don’t convert data into RDF or OWL but provide a simple spreadsheet-like user interface (Populous).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 458 drill bits with 6 attributes are collected by IRIS tool using our template in Figure 5. The second approach involves extracting data out of tables in PDF product catalogs and importing it into spreadsheets with the aim of building product ontologies automatically from spreadsheets in a fast and effective way [25]. We extracted 1544 DTH drill bits designed by Bulroc (http://www.bulroc.com/Brochures/buttonBits.pdf), Halco (www.halco.uk), Mincon (http://www.mincon.com/) and Sandvik (http://tebyc.com/wordpress/wp-content /uploads/ 2012/09/sandvik_dth_tools_product_catalogue.pdf).…”
Section: Brand Individual Individual Relationsmentioning
confidence: 99%