Opioide im Rahmen der Allgemeinanästhesie

Freye, Enno

doi:10.1007/978-3-540-88797-3_19

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 516 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Studies were included if they contained relevant PK parameters or models, established routes of administration, and patients younger than 18 years of age. Identified studies and case reports were reviewed so that only those Table 1 Overview of pharmacological properties of fentanyl and its derivatives [3,4,14,15,52,112,[173][174][175][176][177][178][179][180] 1.7 ± 0.2 (2.5-3.0)…”

Section: Comprehensive Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Correction to: Pharmacokinetics of Fentanyl and Its Derivatives in Children: A Comprehensive Review

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Fentanyl and its derivatives sufentanil, alfentanil, and remifentanil are potent opioids. A comprehensive review of the use of fentanyl and its derivatives in the pediatric population was performed using the National Library of Medicine PubMed. Studies were included if they contained original pharmacokinetic parameters or models using established routes of administration in patients younger than 18 years of age. Of 372 retrieved articles, 44 eligible pharmacokinetic studies contained data of 821 patients younger than 18 years of age, including more than 46 preterm infants, 64 full-term neonates, 115 infants/toddlers, 188 children, and 28 adolescents. Underlying diagnoses included congenital heart and pulmonary disease and abdominal disorders. Routes of drug administration were intravenous, epidural, oral-transmucosal, intranasal, and transdermal. Despite extensive use in daily clinical practice, few studies have been performed. Preterm and term infants have lower clearance and protein binding. Pharmacokinetics was not altered by chronic renal or hepatic disease. Analyses of the pooled individual patients' data revealed that clearance maturation relating to body weight could be best described by the Hill function for sufentanil (R 2 = 0.71, B max 876 mL/min, K 50 16.3 kg) and alfentanil (R 2 = 0.70, B max (fixed) 420 mL/min, K 50 28 kg). The allometric exponent for estimation of clearance of sufentanil was 0.99 and 0.75 for alfentanil clearance. Maturation of remifentanil clearance was described by linear regression to bodyweight (R 2 = 0.69). The allometric exponent for estimation of remifentanil clearance was 0.76. For fentanyl, linear regression showed only a weak correlation between clearance and bodyweight in preterm and term neonates (R 2 = 0.22) owing to a lack of data in older age groups. A large heterogeneity regarding study design, clinical setting, drug administration, laboratory assays, and pharmacokinetic estimation was observed between studies introducing bias into the analyses performed in this review. A limitation of this review is that pharmacokinetic data, based on different modes of administration, dosing schemes, and parameter estimation methods, were combined.The online version of the original article can be found under

show abstract