2021
DOI: 10.1111/papr.13091
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Opioid‐sparing effects of ultrasound‐guided erector spinae plane block for adult patients undergoing surgery: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Abstract: Background Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is a new method of administering analgesics to patients perioperatively. The aim of this meta‐analysis was to evaluate the opioid‐sparing effects of erector spinae plane block in patients during the perioperative period compared to conventional analgesia and identify its role in the development of opioid‐free anesthesia. Methods Relevant study articles were retrieved from PubMed, the Web of Science, Medline via Ovid, Embase via Ovid, and the Cochrane Central Registe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our updated analysis, ESPB reduced the pain score at postoperative 24 h. To our knowledge, this is the first meta-analysis to show the long-lasting analgesic effect of ESPB at 24 h in LC. Postoperative opioid consumption was also lower than that in the control group, which is consistent with the findings of previous studies [39][40][41]. Unexpectedly, no significant difference was noted in the intraoperative opioid consumption between the ESPB and control groups.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In our updated analysis, ESPB reduced the pain score at postoperative 24 h. To our knowledge, this is the first meta-analysis to show the long-lasting analgesic effect of ESPB at 24 h in LC. Postoperative opioid consumption was also lower than that in the control group, which is consistent with the findings of previous studies [39][40][41]. Unexpectedly, no significant difference was noted in the intraoperative opioid consumption between the ESPB and control groups.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Although the estimated incidence of haematoma after peripheral nerve blocks is between 0.67% and 0.82% [9], the clinically significant haemorrhagic complications are mainly attributed to deep, non‐compressible nerve blocks such as paravertebral, lumbar sympathetic, lumbar plexus blocks [10]. The ESP block provides analgesia for multiple dermatomes with haemodynamic stability [11]. So, considering the above‐mentioned advantages, we deemed that ESP block would be a better alternative to paravertebral or neuraxial block in this case.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In summary, the ESP block is a technically straightforward approach that can have an opioid‐sparing effect in the peri‐operative period with a lower risk of complications in an anticoagulated patient than central neuraxial blocks [8, 11, 12]. This case highlights the effective peri‐operative analgesia provided to the patient with the help of a relatively simple ESP block for a complicated and extensive clavicle surgery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, ultrasound-guided ESPB is a safer analgesic technique and is technically simpler than the above 2 modalities. Therefore, many authors have proposed that it could be used as a component of multimodal analgesia to accelerate postoperative recovery (15)(16)(17). Although ultrasound-guided ESPB is mainly used for adult patients, some pediatric indications have been reported (18)(19)(20).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%