2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2009.12.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Opioid modulation of song in male zebra finches (Taenopygia guttata)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
46
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
4
46
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The density of m opioid receptors was highest in the VTA in this study. A recent study also reports m opioid receptor immunopositivity in VTA and POM in adult male zebra finches (Khurshid et al, 2010); other receptor subtypes were not measured and this species is not seasonal, so direct comparisons with the present study are limited. Systemi- cally administered fentanyl, a m opioid receptor-specific agonist, decreased singing in European starlings, particularly those males that normally sang at a high rate (Schroeder and Riters, 2006); central injections to specific brain regions are required to determine if the effect is mediated by reward centers studied here, by the song system itself, regions of which also express m opioid receptors Deviche, 1995, 1999;Khurshid et al, 2009), or perhaps is due to a non-specific narcotic effect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The density of m opioid receptors was highest in the VTA in this study. A recent study also reports m opioid receptor immunopositivity in VTA and POM in adult male zebra finches (Khurshid et al, 2010); other receptor subtypes were not measured and this species is not seasonal, so direct comparisons with the present study are limited. Systemi- cally administered fentanyl, a m opioid receptor-specific agonist, decreased singing in European starlings, particularly those males that normally sang at a high rate (Schroeder and Riters, 2006); central injections to specific brain regions are required to determine if the effect is mediated by reward centers studied here, by the song system itself, regions of which also express m opioid receptors Deviche, 1995, 1999;Khurshid et al, 2009), or perhaps is due to a non-specific narcotic effect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Collectively, these studies suggest that opioid administration leads to satiety and reduces motivated behavior whereas opioid receptor antagonist treatment increases motivated behavior, as if the animal continues to try to receive an expected reward (Riters, 2009). Conversely, a recent study on zebra finches (Taenopygia guttata) found that systemic administration of a low (2.5 mg/kg), but not high (10 mg/kg), dose of naloxone decreases directed song rate and also affects spectral and temporal components of songs (Khurshid et al, 2010). The authors suggest that the dose-response profile reflects differential effects on the three opioid receptor subtypes at low vs. high dose, and that the opposite finding to that in European Starlings may be due to a species difference or to the fact that zebra finches with low song rates were excluded from their study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Previous studies have provided evidence linking dopamine (Heimovics et al, 2009; Merullo et al, 2016) and opioids (Khurshid et al, 2010; Riters et al, 2014) with undirected communication. Given that the endocannabinoid system interacts with these and other neurochemical systems to modulate motivation and reward (Solinas et al, 2007; 2008), future work should examine how these neural systems interact in the reward processes associated with vocal communication.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whether the self-motivated spaced training/practice of vocalization is generally observed in other vocal learners such as parrots, cetaceans and humans is yet to be investigated. Multiple lines of recent studies in songbirds showed a potential link of enkephalin and mu-opioid receptors in the medial preoptic nucleus and ventral tegmental area, which are highly conserved in mammals and birds to regulate undirected singing (Khurshid et al, 2010;Riters et al, 2005). However, the neural mechanisms underlying self-motivated singing behavior have not been well characterized, especially in the developmental changes of singing frequency and timing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%