Opinions regarding unstimulated IVF: a survey of clinics reporting to SART

Gordon, John; DiMattina, M.; Botes, A.; Celia, Gerard

doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.07.631

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Results1

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2013

2015

Publication Types

Select...

Book2

Article2

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent4

Authors

Journals

Cited by 4 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…However, a new trend has emerged over the last 10 years or less. According to a survey in the USA, the cause appears to be the low success rates and the lack of patient interest (Gordon et al 2010 ); however, this contrasts with a patient survey in which many patients would even prefer a ncIVF treatment if the pregnancy rates were only 10-15 % per initiated cycle (Pistorius et al 2006 ). Even IVF treatments without hormonal treatments are a realistic option because the age of the patients at the time of IVF treatment is growing rapidly and in low/poor responders, gonadotropin stimulation is rarely indicated or not indicated at all.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%