Opinions 97, 98 and 99

Arahal, David R.

doi:10.1099/ijsem.0.003921

Cited by 9 publications

(16 citation statements)

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The ballot of Judicial Commission on this matter yield eleven votes for this conclusion and one abstention. Analogous conclusions were presented in Opinions 98 and 99 [41].…”

Section: Opinion 109supporting

confidence: 76%

“…This conclusion was obtained unanimously, with one abstention. Analogous conclusions were presented in Opinions 98 and 99 [41].…”

Section: Opinion 110supporting

confidence: 76%

“…Rule 18c is not directly involved in the rejection of names, which is regulated by Rule 56a. Issues related to the interpretation Rule 18c were explained by Tindall [8] and in Judicial Opinions 98 and 99 [41]. Since a neotype strain was not suggested for Bacillus aerophilus Shivaji et al 2006 In the original article [46], Bacillus aerophilus 28K T and Bacillus stratosphericus 41KF2a T were described as belonging to the Bacillus licheniformis clade.…”

Section: Opinion 109mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The 2-year period stipulated in Rule 18c is the period between the proposal of a neotype strain and its establishment. Issues related to the interpretation Rule 18c were explained in Judicial Opinions 98 and 99 [41] and particularly by Tindall [8]. However, the status of Hyphomonas rosenbergii Weiner et al 2000 indeed needs to be clarified.…”

Section: Opinion 108mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Judicial Opinions 103–111

Arahal

Busse

Bull

et al. 2022

International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In Opinion 103, the request to place the name Spirillum volutans Ehrenberg 1832 (Approved Lists 1980) on the list of rejected names is denied because a neotype may be designated. Similarly, because a neotype may be designated, in Opinion 104 the request to place the name Beijerinckia fluminensis Döbereiner and Ruschel 1958 (Approved Lists 1980) on the list of rejected names is denied. In Opinion 105, it is emphasized that the name Rhodoligotrophos Fukuda et al. 2012 does not contravene the Code. The request to orthographically correct Rhodoligotrophos Fukuda et al. 2012 to Rhodoligotrophus corrig. Fukuda et al. 2012 is denied. Opinion 106 addresses two Requests for an Opinion and results in the placement of the epithet hoagii in Corynebacterium hoagii (Morse 1912) Eberson 1918 (Approved Lists 1980) and Rhodococcus hoagii (Morse 1912) Kämpfer et al. 2014 on the list of rejected specific and subspecific epithets. Since this removes all known available earlier synonyms of Rhodococcus equi (Magnusson 1923) Goodfellow and Alderson 1977 (Approved Lists 1980), the request to conserve the epithet equi in this name is denied. In Opinion 107, Thermomicrobium fosteri Phillips and Perry 1976 (Approved Lists 1980) is placed on the list of rejected names as a nomen dubium et confusum. Opinion 108 denies the request to place Hyphomonas rosenbergii Weiner et al. 2000 on the list of rejected names because the information provided to the Judicial Commission is not sufficient to draw a conclusion on this matter. In Opinion 109, which addresses three Requests for an Opinion, the Judicial Commission denies the requests to place the names Bacillus aerius Shivaji et al. 2006, Bacillus aerophilus Shivaji et al. 2006 and Bacillus stratosphericus Shivaji et al. 2006 on the list of rejected names. Instead, it is concluded that these three names had not met the requirements for valid publication. Likewise, the Judicial Commission concludes in Opinion 110 that the name Actinobaculum massiliense corrig. Greub and Raoult 2006 had not met the requirements for valid publication. The Judicial Commission reaffirms in Opinion 111 that Methanocorpusculum parvum Zellner et al. 1988 is the nomenclatural type of Methanocorpusculum Zellner et al. 1988 and further emphasizes that the species was not in danger of losing this status. These Opinions were ratified by the voting members of the International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes.

show abstract

“…The ballot of Judicial Commission on this matter yield eleven votes for this conclusion and one abstention. Analogous conclusions were presented in Opinions 98 and 99 [41].…”

Section: Opinion 109supporting

confidence: 76%

“…This conclusion was obtained unanimously, with one abstention. Analogous conclusions were presented in Opinions 98 and 99 [41].…”

Section: Opinion 110supporting

confidence: 76%

Section: Opinion 109mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Opinion 108mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Judicial Opinions 103–111

Arahal

Busse

Bull

et al. 2022

International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This holds because the name does not meet the requirements for valid publication given in Rule 27(3), which refers to Rule 30 for names of species. A similar point was made in previous Judicial Opinions [10, 62].…”

Section: Opinion 117supporting

confidence: 79%

Judicial Opinions 112–122

Arahal

Busse

Bull

et al. 2022

International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Opinion 112 denies the request to place Seliberia Aristovskaya and Parinkina 1963 (Approved Lists 1980) on the list of rejected names because the information provided is insufficient. For the same reason, Opinion 113 denies the request to reject Shewanella irciniae Lee et al. 2006 and Opinion 114 denies the request to reject the name Enterobacter siamensis Khunthongpan et al. 2014. Opinion 115 rejects the epithet of Moorella thermoautotrophica (Wiegel et al. 1981) Collins et al. 1994, which is regarded as a nomen confusum. To assess the consequences of Rule 8, Opinion 116 revisits names of taxa above the rank of genus which should comprise the stem of the name of a nomenclatural type and a category-specific ending but fail to do so. Such names should be orthographically corrected if the sole error is the inadvertent usage of an incorrect stem or be regarded as illegitimate if otherwise. The necessary corrections are made for a number of names. In Opinion 117, the request to designate Methylothermus subterraneus Hirayama et al. 2011 as the type species of the genus Methylothermus is denied because an equivalent action compatible with the Code was already conducted. In Opinion 118, the possible orthographical correction of the name Flaviaesturariibacter is treated, as are the analogous cases of Fredinandcohnia and Hydrogeniiclostidium . The genus names are corrected to Flaviaestuariibacter, Ferdinandcohnia and Hydrogeniiclostridium , respectively. Opinion 119 concludes that assigning Actinomycetales Buchanan 1917 (Approved Lists 1980) as nomenclatural type of the class Actinobacteria Stackebrandt et al. 1997 would not render that name legitimate if Rule 8 remained retroactive. The request is granted but Actinomycetales is also assigned as type of Actinomycetes Krassilnikov 1949 (Approved Lists 1980). In Opinion 120, the possible orthographical correction of the name Amycolatopsis albidoflavus is treated. It is grammatically corrected to Amycolatopsis albidoflava. Six names which could according to Rule 61 be grammatically corrected by anyone are also corrected. Opinion 121 denies the request to revise Opinion 69 and notes that Opinion 69 does not have the undesirable consequences emphasized in the request. In Opinion 122, the request to reject various taxon names of Mollicutes proposed in 2018 is denied because it is based on misinterpretations of the Code, which are clarified. Alternative ways to solve the perceived problems are outlined. These Opinions were ratified by the voting members of the International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes.

show abstract

Emergence of New Spoilage Microorganisms in the Brewing Industry and Development of Microbiological Quality Control Methods to Cope with This Phenomenon: A Review

Suzuki¹

2020

Journal of the American Society of Brewing Chemists

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Opinions 97, 98 and 99

Cited by 9 publications

References 15 publications

Judicial Opinions 103–111

Judicial Opinions 103–111

Judicial Opinions 112–122

Emergence of New Spoilage Microorganisms in the Brewing Industry and Development of Microbiological Quality Control Methods to Cope with This Phenomenon: A Review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About