Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web 2015
DOI: 10.1145/2736277.2741085
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Opinion Spam Detection in Web Forum

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
45
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
45
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In our setting, we used the learning rates η t that asymptotically decrease with iteration numbers (Bottou, 2012). Following previous work (Ott et al, 2011;Chen and Chen, 2015), we conducted five-fold cross-validation experiments, and determined the values of the regularization and hyper parameters via a grid-search method. Table 3 reports the spam and nonspam review detection accuracy of our methods SMTL-LLR and MTL-LR against all other baseline methods.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In our setting, we used the learning rates η t that asymptotically decrease with iteration numbers (Bottou, 2012). Following previous work (Ott et al, 2011;Chen and Chen, 2015), we conducted five-fold cross-validation experiments, and determined the values of the regularization and hyper parameters via a grid-search method. Table 3 reports the spam and nonspam review detection accuracy of our methods SMTL-LLR and MTL-LR against all other baseline methods.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They found that the supervised support vector machines (SVM) trained on the textual n-gram features can achieve good performance. Feng et al (2012) presented syntactic stylometry features and trained SVM model for deception detection, while Chen and Chen (2015) built the SVM classifier on a diversity of features, such as content and thread features, for opinion spam detection in web forum. In addition, Li et al (2014) employed a featurebased additive model to explore the general rule for deceptive opinion spam detection.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In [28], the authors used temporal approach to detect spams and is based on the burst patterns and frequency of reviews. Chen and Chen [29] used similar burst patterns approach of reviews along with a temporal feature to detect the behaviour of the users. A burst pattern may not be a good indicator to judge the spam, as a user may be writing reviews for many products.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chen and Chen [23] introduced research relied on a set of interior records of opinion spams collected from a shady marketing campaign. They discovered the properties of opinion spams and spammers on a website to get some insights.…”
Section: Opinion Spam Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%