2004
DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2004.48
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms on the use of antibiotic resistance genes as marker genes in genetically modified plants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
(43 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sandoval-Vargas et al (2019) have also recently reported the use of ptxD as a selectable marker for the C. reinhardtii chloroplast, and our combined work adds a useful dominant marker to the molecular toolbox (Esland et al 2018). Importantly, this marker is not derived from a bacterial antibiotic resistance gene and therefore raises less concerns regarding GM regulation (EFSA GMO Panel 2004;Beacham et al 2017). Finally, selection of transformants based on phosphite metabolism does not suffer from false-positive issues as spontaneous mutants able to oxidise phosphite are very unlikely to arise.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Sandoval-Vargas et al (2019) have also recently reported the use of ptxD as a selectable marker for the C. reinhardtii chloroplast, and our combined work adds a useful dominant marker to the molecular toolbox (Esland et al 2018). Importantly, this marker is not derived from a bacterial antibiotic resistance gene and therefore raises less concerns regarding GM regulation (EFSA GMO Panel 2004;Beacham et al 2017). Finally, selection of transformants based on phosphite metabolism does not suffer from false-positive issues as spontaneous mutants able to oxidise phosphite are very unlikely to arise.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Such a metabolic marker is superior to the frequently used antibiotic resistance markers since selection uses a cheap substrate (Phi) and eliminates the problem of 'false positives' since the spontaneous acquisition of Phi metabolism is not possible. Furthermore, the use of metabolic markers helps address the regulatory and safety concerns associated with the environmental spread of antibiotic resistance genes by horizontal gene transfer (HGT) during commercial cultivation (EFSA GMO Panel 2004;Beacham et al 2017). Various reports have shown that ptxD can serve as an efficient marker for generation of transgenic plants (López-Arredondo and Herrera-Estrella 2013; Nahampun et al 2016;Pandeya et al 2017), yeasts (Kanda et al 2014) and cyanobacteria (Selão et al 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The C. reinhardtii chloroplast is actively being explored as a GRAS (‘Generally Recognised As Safe’) and sustainable platform for the commercial production of recombinant proteins [ 4 , 5 , 37 ]. Nevertheless, the presence within the engineered chloroplast of multiple copies of an antibiotic resistance marker is undesirable, both from a regulatory [ 7 ] and a metabolic burden perspective [ 8 ]. ‘Marker-free’ strategies based on the phenotypic rescue of a mutation within the plastome are preferable, and various photosynthetic mutants with point mutations or deletions in chloroplast genes have been used for the selection of transformants [ 8 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One key consideration of any microbial cell platform used in biotechnology is the presence in the genome of transgenes encoding antibiotic resistance that are introduced as selectable markers during transgenesis, and could spread to other microorganisms via horizontal gene transfer [ 7 ]. Given the chloroplast’s evolutionary history as an endosymbiont of an early cyanobacterial cell, such antibiotic-based selectable markers designed for high-level expression in the chloroplast are often functional in bacteria [ 8 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, the large-scale cultivation of GM-plants, i.e., on about 170 million hectares worldwide (James, 2012), results in multitudinous opportunities for bacterial exposure to recombinant DNA and therefore, opportunities for unintended horizontal dissemination of transgenes (EFSA, 2004, 2009; Nielsen et al, 2005; Levy-Booth et al, 2007; Wögerbauer, 2007; Pietramellara et al, 2009; Brigulla and Wackernagel, 2010). In laboratory settings, experimental studies have demonstrated that single bacterial species can take up and recombine with DNA fragments from GM-plants under optimized conditions (e.g., Gebhard and Smalla, 1998; de Vries et al, 2001; Kay et al, 2002; Ceccherini et al, 2003).…”
Section: Introduction To Hgt In Bacterial Populationsmentioning
confidence: 99%