2005
DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2005.291
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Opinion of the Scientific Panel on additives and products or substances used in animal feed (FEEDAP) on the safety of use of colouring agents in animal nutrition - PART I. General Principles and Astaxanthin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 96 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The clinical application of astaxanthin can be diverse, judging from the organ protective effects it shows and its established safety profile. Astaxanthin has existed as a food additive for more than two decades, and has been judged by European Medical Agency (EMA) as not harboring mutagenicity, reproductive/developmental toxicity, and clastogenecity [27]. The report from EMA also identified that healthy human volunteers consuming 5 to 12 mg of astaxanthin daily for 4 to 8 weeks did not exhibit intolerance or toxicity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The clinical application of astaxanthin can be diverse, judging from the organ protective effects it shows and its established safety profile. Astaxanthin has existed as a food additive for more than two decades, and has been judged by European Medical Agency (EMA) as not harboring mutagenicity, reproductive/developmental toxicity, and clastogenecity [27]. The report from EMA also identified that healthy human volunteers consuming 5 to 12 mg of astaxanthin daily for 4 to 8 weeks did not exhibit intolerance or toxicity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Noticeably, there is a potential relation between the content of astaxanthin and the ω3 PUFA. For example, salmonidae fish and Antarctic Krill are rich in astaxanthin and ω3 PUFA, including EPA and DHA (Demmelmair et al, 2018;EFSA, 2005;Lou et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23 Although these differences were considered by the applicant as unlikely to significantly affect the toxicity, the FEEDAP Panel noted that no evidence were provided to support this. The safety of the additive for the target species and the consumer was assumed based on studies not in line with current standards and based on data from the literature, evaluated in an EFSA opinion in 2005 (EFSA, 2005 ).…”
Section: Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2006, the FEEDAP Panel concluded that the ATX‐rich Phaffia rhodozyma (formulation not given), when used at the proposed condition of use, was considered safe for salmonids, based on the results of a tolerance study in Atlantic salmon. In the same opinion, it was reported that, based on data from literature described in an EFSA opinion adopted in 2005 (EFSA, 2005 ), ATX was tolerated in salmon and trout with a margin of three in salmon and of two in trout (EFSA, 2006 ).…”
Section: Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation