2008
DOI: 10.1007/s10633-008-9115-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ophthalmological examination and VEPs in preterm children with perinatal CNS involvement

Abstract: Five children with a history of preterm birth (mean gestational age of 27 weeks; birth weight 870-1,380 g) and perinatal post-hemorrhagic hydrocephalus were examined ophthalmologically at ages ranging from 4-11 years. An extended visual evoked potentials (VEPs) examination was simultaneously performed, using pattern-reversal, motion-onset, and cognitive visual stimuli. Although 3 of the 10 eyes displayed about normal visual acuity (> or =0.9), all of the examined eyes were abnormal for at least one variant of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…24 Our data would therefore suggest that excitatory activity in response to visual stimulation was higher in school-age children born preterm than full-term. Although many studies using similar visual evoked potential techniques have reported otherwise (ie, lower amplitudes in preterm births), 24,70 several have shown higher amplitudes, albeit in different clinical populations. For example, Cokcay et al 71 reported high visual evoked potential amplitudes in children with occipital epilepsy, which they explained as hyperexcitability of the occipital cortical structures mostly attributable to immaturity.…”
Section: Electrophysiological Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…24 Our data would therefore suggest that excitatory activity in response to visual stimulation was higher in school-age children born preterm than full-term. Although many studies using similar visual evoked potential techniques have reported otherwise (ie, lower amplitudes in preterm births), 24,70 several have shown higher amplitudes, albeit in different clinical populations. For example, Cokcay et al 71 reported high visual evoked potential amplitudes in children with occipital epilepsy, which they explained as hyperexcitability of the occipital cortical structures mostly attributable to immaturity.…”
Section: Electrophysiological Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Children with periventricular white matter damage commonly show reduced perception of movement, which has been demonstrated with visual evoked potentials to global motion and motion onset (Weinstein et al 2012 ;Kuba et al 2008 ). Impaired motion perception is common in children born before 34 weeks, and is more marked in those who manifest periventricular white matter lesions (Guzzetta et al 2009 ).…”
Section: Perception Of Movementmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Prematurity has also previously been reported to affect the VEP results (Kuba et al, 2008). No patient had abnormal optic discs while two patients with abnormal VEP were noticed to have a clinically thin retina.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%