2021
DOI: 10.1137/20m1366307
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Operator Splitting for a Homogeneous Embedding of the Linear Complementarity Problem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where the first step is due to completing squares. Letting ρ = 2γ for some γ ∈ (0, 1) in the inequality above gives (10), which completes the proof.…”
Section: Appendix I Proof Of Lemmamentioning
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where the first step is due to completing squares. Letting ρ = 2γ for some γ ∈ (0, 1) in the inequality above gives (10), which completes the proof.…”
Section: Appendix I Proof Of Lemmamentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Traditional conic optimization methods detect infeasibility by computing matrix inverse (or equivalently, solving linear equation systems), usually as a subroutine of the interiorpoint method [6] or the Douglas-Rachford-splitting method [7], [1], [8], [9], [2], [10]. Such computation is numerically expensive for large-scale problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The semi-definite program described by Equations ( 40)-( 42) was implemented in the python-embedded modeling language cvxpy [32] and solved using the splitting conic solver [33].…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, in the last two decades, a number of scalable SDP solvers were successfully developed. For example, the packages PENNON [62] and SDPNAL+ [103] are based on the Augmented Lagrangian method, and SCS [82] is based on the Alternating Direction of Multipliers method (ADMM). A comprehensive review of the latest advancements in the scalability of SDP solvers is given in [74].…”
Section: Sensor Network Localization Via Semidefinite Programming Rel...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We compare results in terms of runtime and RMSD with three well-established solvers: DSDP v5.8 [15], a generic SDP solver based on a second-order dual interior-point method, SCS (Splitting Conic Solver) version 3.1.0 [82], a generic large-scale conic solver based on ADMM, and SDPNAL+ version 1.0 [103], a large-scale SDP solver based on a semismooth Newton-CG augmented Lagrangian method. We run the same examples listed in table 3.…”
Section: Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 99%