2022
DOI: 10.1007/s13324-022-00765-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Operator estimates for non-periodically perforated domains with Dirichlet and nonlinear Robin conditions: vanishing limit

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
19
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
3
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case when the Robin condition is present and is linear, these are operator estimates describing the norm resolvent convergence of the perturbed operator to the homogenized one. Similar operator estimates were already established in the case of only Dirichlet condition on the boundaries of the cavities, when the solution vanishes in the limit [21], and also in the case of the Neumann condition on the boundaries of the cavities [22], when the cavities disappear under the homogenization. And in the present paper, we show that the operator estimates are also present in a much more nontrivial situation, when a strange term appears.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 71%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In the case when the Robin condition is present and is linear, these are operator estimates describing the norm resolvent convergence of the perturbed operator to the homogenized one. Similar operator estimates were already established in the case of only Dirichlet condition on the boundaries of the cavities, when the solution vanishes in the limit [21], and also in the case of the Neumann condition on the boundaries of the cavities [22], when the cavities disappear under the homogenization. And in the present paper, we show that the operator estimates are also present in a much more nontrivial situation, when a strange term appears.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…This is a standard estimate for the L 2 -norm of the trace of a function from W 1 2 -norm, and we additionally state that it is uniform on 𝜀 and k. The latter statement is implied by a similar estimate for u ∈ B R 3 (0)∖𝜔 k,𝜀 established in the proof of Lemma 3.5 in [21]. The mentioned estimate from [21] was established by passing to local variables (𝜏, s) in the vicinity of the boundaries 𝜕 ωk,𝜀 , the existence of which is ensured by Assumption A.1, and then the proof follows standard lines. In this proof, also Lemma 3.2 from [21] is to be used, which provides an estimate…”
Section: Lemma 33 Under Assumption A1 and Also Under Assumption A2 If...supporting
confidence: 55%
See 3 more Smart Citations