2011
DOI: 10.1007/s00264-011-1431-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Operative versus nonoperative treatment for acute Achilles tendon rupture: a meta-analysis based on current evidence

Abstract: Compared with conservative treatment, operative treatment can effectively reduce the risk of re-rupture but increase the probability of complications. The increased complication risk may be associated with open repair surgery. However, no sufficient evidence is available from current studies to support the belief that operation may lead to better functional recovery.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
137
0
15

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 143 publications
(156 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
4
137
0
15
Order By: Relevance
“…11 21.91) or percutaneous repair (RR=9.32; 95% CI, 1.77-49.16). 12 Nonetheless, other randomised controlled trials report no significant difference in the re-rupture rate between conservative and surgical treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 21.91) or percutaneous repair (RR=9.32; 95% CI, 1.77-49.16). 12 Nonetheless, other randomised controlled trials report no significant difference in the re-rupture rate between conservative and surgical treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Los resultados de los estudios 32 confirman que en el tratamiento de la ruptura aguda del tendón de Aquiles, la cirugía puede reducir eficazmente el riesgo de rotura recurrente, pero es difícil evitar una alta tasa de complicaciones.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…En el estudio de Jiang y col. 32 fueron seleccionados un total de 894 pacientes con una edad media de 41 años, los cuales se dividieron en dos grupos: uno tratado mediante tratamiento quirúrgico y otro mediante tratamiento conservador, diferenciando entre hombres y mujeres y el miembro lesionado (lado derecho/lado izquierdo). El tiempo medio de seguimiento en un rango de 1-5 años fue de 2.5, y en un rango de 0.5-1 años fue de 0.67.…”
Section: Descripción De Los Estudiosunclassified
“…Wilkins et al [54•] reported a reduced risk of re-rupture with surgical repair although surgery resulted in other complications, such as deep infections, scar complaints, and sural nerve injury, which were not seen with nonoperative treatment. Similarly, Jiang et al [55] concluded that operative treatment can effectively reduce the risk of re-rupture but increase complication risk with open repair. They emphasized that no sufficient evidence is available from current studies to support the theory that operative repair can lead to better functional outcomes.…”
Section: Operative Vs Nonoperative Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 97%