2010
DOI: 10.4055/cios.2010.2.3.154
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Operative Treatment of Clavicle Midshaft Fractures: Comparison between Reconstruction Plate and Reconstruction Locking Compression Plate

Abstract: BackgroundTo compare the outcomes of reconstruction plate and reconstruction locking compression plate (LCP) for the treatment of clavicle midshaft fractures.MethodsForty one patients with a clavicle midshaft fracture were treated by internal fixation with a reconstruction plate (19 patients) or reconstruction LCP (22 patients). The clinical and radiological results were evaluated according to the Quick Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score and plain radiographs.ResultsThe mean time to union w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
25
0
4

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
25
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results can be compared with other recent studies (Table 1) [3,4,6,8,10,12,16,19,23,24]. Our investigation is the only one that compared nonoperative versus plating treatment using both DASH and CSS scores.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our results can be compared with other recent studies (Table 1) [3,4,6,8,10,12,16,19,23,24]. Our investigation is the only one that compared nonoperative versus plating treatment using both DASH and CSS scores.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Third, DASH and CSS scores do not consider individual patient differences resulting from age, general health, or personal problems. Even so, DASH and CSS have been used widely as standard measures of function [3,4,6,8,10,12,16,19,23,24]. Fourth, there was substantial preoperative delay in some cases, so some fractures may have partially healed by 28 days.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a study by Lazarus MD [11] , union of the fracture occured between 6-12 weeks. In a study by Cho et al [12] , bony union time was 13.2 weeks and 14.6 weeks for locking compression plate fixation and reconstruction plate fixation respectively. In our study, the average time for union of majority of the fractures was 12.7 weeks (56 patients i.e 93.3%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recommended plate type is compression plate or lag screw with a neutralization plate, where each segment carries a minimum of 3 bicortical screws. (4) A comparative study (30) on the use of reconstruction plates versus reconstruction locking compression plates in the treatment of midshaft clavicle fractures showed that both implants provided good stability. In this study, aside from one case of infected nonunion, the additional 4 cases of nonunion received a reconstruction plate with autogenous bone graft (one case without bone graft), where all 4 cases achieved successful bone union.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%