2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00132-021-04128-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Operative Strategien bei der Versorgung neuromuskulärer Skoliosen

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Early surgery, associated with less pelvic obliquity, seems to be associated with a higher degree of deformity. 2,9,12 In this study, greater curve correction was observed in the traction group, which had greater pelvic obliquity, though not statistically significant. In this case, however, there is a similarity with the Tøndevold et al study 11 in which neither group obtained a notable change in pelvic obliquity, which may be explained by the greater rigidity of the curvature in the traction group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 46%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Early surgery, associated with less pelvic obliquity, seems to be associated with a higher degree of deformity. 2,9,12 In this study, greater curve correction was observed in the traction group, which had greater pelvic obliquity, though not statistically significant. In this case, however, there is a similarity with the Tøndevold et al study 11 in which neither group obtained a notable change in pelvic obliquity, which may be explained by the greater rigidity of the curvature in the traction group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 46%
“…While age was not a decisive criterion in defining the moment of surgery, 9 it was observed that the ISST group was younger and with more severe curves, though without a statistical difference, than the without traction group. The decisive factor for a surgical indication was that the progression of the disease was more severe and earlier, with a high preoperative Cobb angle (86.28º ± 25.51 -ISST vs. 67.15º ± 13.35 -Group without ISST), with mean ages of 13.78±3.27 and 16.88±5.64 years, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations