2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00064-019-0614-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Operative „No-touch“-Techniken zur Korrektur kindlicher Skoliosen

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
3

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
2
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The cohort is, therefore, homogenous to an extent that is hardly ever achieved in other studies involving EOS patients [ 9 , 19 , 20 ]. Furthermore, most children suffering from SMA are treated with GFSI if their life expectancy allows for this [ 21 , 22 ]. In fact, the prognosis of SMA has recently changed dramatically with the advent of gene therapy [ 23 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cohort is, therefore, homogenous to an extent that is hardly ever achieved in other studies involving EOS patients [ 9 , 19 , 20 ]. Furthermore, most children suffering from SMA are treated with GFSI if their life expectancy allows for this [ 21 , 22 ]. In fact, the prognosis of SMA has recently changed dramatically with the advent of gene therapy [ 23 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been postulated that autofusion of the spine might be reduced using bilateral rib to pelvis fixation without touching the spine itself [13]. This implant construct is recommended and commonly used in nonambulatory children, such as spinal muscular atrophy or myelomeningocele patients [14,15]. Despite the reluctance to use this implant construct in ambulatory children, a small number of patients with severe double curve progressive scoliosis may also benefit from this technique.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sie können an der Wirbelsäule selbst, an Rippen und/oder den Beckenkämmen fixiert sein mit Haken und/oder Schrauben (Campbell et al 2004;Hell et al 2018) Bei wachstumsfreundlichen Implantaten handelt es sich um Implantate mit einer Restflexibilität und möglichst wenig Fixierungspunkten, um Wachstum weiterhin zuzulassen und Autofusionen zu minimieren (Groenefeld und Hell 2013). Allen Systemen gemein ist, dass eine Verlängerung der Implantate erfolgt, sei es durch eine manuelle Distraktion während einer Operation oder von außen gesteuert (Campbell et al 2004;Akbarnia und Hosseini 2016;Lorenz et al 2019b). Die Zeitabstände variieren zumeist zwischen drei bis sechs Monaten.…”
Section: Indikation Der Behandlungunclassified