1995
DOI: 10.1007/bf01461011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Operations on continuous bundles of C*-algebras

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
126
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(128 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
126
0
Order By: Relevance
“…algebra of classical observables A 0 in (2.24), whereas for the N → ∞ limit of quantum statistical mechanics there are even two (relevant) possibilities: the (noncommutative) algebras B N in (2.34) can be glued continuously to either the algebra of (quasi-) local observables B l ∞ in (2.39), which is noncommutative, too (and hence is the more obvious choice), or to the commutative algebra of global observables B g ∞ in (2.40). The "glueing" is done using the formalism of continuous fields of C*-algebras (of observables); we will just look at the cases of interest for our three models, and refer the reader to Dixmier (1977) and Kirchberg & Wassermann (1995) for the abstract theory. 40 Continuity of the dynamics in the various limits at hand will be a corollary, provided time-evolution is expressed in terms of the one-parameter automorphism groups τ .…”
Section: Continuitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…algebra of classical observables A 0 in (2.24), whereas for the N → ∞ limit of quantum statistical mechanics there are even two (relevant) possibilities: the (noncommutative) algebras B N in (2.34) can be glued continuously to either the algebra of (quasi-) local observables B l ∞ in (2.39), which is noncommutative, too (and hence is the more obvious choice), or to the commutative algebra of global observables B g ∞ in (2.40). The "glueing" is done using the formalism of continuous fields of C*-algebras (of observables); we will just look at the cases of interest for our three models, and refer the reader to Dixmier (1977) and Kirchberg & Wassermann (1995) for the abstract theory. 40 Continuity of the dynamics in the various limits at hand will be a corollary, provided time-evolution is expressed in terms of the one-parameter automorphism groups τ .…”
Section: Continuitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…40 The idea of a continuous fields of C*-algebras goes back to Dixmier (1977), who gave a direct definition in terms of glueing conditions between the fibers, and was usefully reformulated by Kirchberg & Wassermann (1995), who stressed the role of the continuous sections of the field already in its definition. Both definitions are reviewed in Landsman (1998).…”
Section: Continuous Fields Of C*-algebrasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recall that a continuous field of C * -algebras (see [4,9]) is the natural notion of a bundle of C * -algebras. The fibers are all C * -algebras, the space of (continuous) sections is a C * -algebra, and for each point of the base space there is an evaluation map, a * -homomorphism of the algebra of sections onto the fiber algebra.…”
Section: Generalitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The above notion of continuous bundle has been given in [14]: it is a simplified version of the classical notion of continuous field (see [7, §10]). We refer to the last-cited reference for the notions of restriction ( [7, 10.1.7] and local triviality ([7, 10.1.8]), which are the analogues to well-known notions in the setting of topological bundles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%