Operational Risks and Firm Market Performance: Evidence from China*

Abstract

This study investigates how different operational risks impact firm stock market performance. By using a sample of 762 operational risk events published by 543 listed Chinese firms over the period of 2010–2017, we document an overall significantly negative market reaction to operational risks. Specifically, we find that the stock market reaction differs across operational risk types. Man‐made operational risk and disruption operational risk events are associated with greater negative market reaction than nature‐caused and nondisruption operational risk events, respectively. We further find that regulatory violations (external risks) have a smaller negative market reaction than operational incidents (internal risks). Finally, we show that different determinants of competitive forces, namely, a firm's market share and product substitutability, have contrasting effects on the market reaction of all operational risks. These findings can aid various stakeholders to understand the impact of different operational risks and advance cost‐effective mechanisms aimed at mitigating operational risks in China, with potential application to other regions.

. Operational risk factors and the sustainability of small and medium manufacturing enterprises in South Africa

“…One of these major risks that business entities face is an operational risk (Engle, 2009;Bai, Gao & Sarkis, 2021), which is inherent in every human activity and ascends from activities such as acts of fraud, errors, negligence, violations, technological failure events, process deficiencies, system flaws, acts of terrorists and vandalism, as well as natural disasters like floods, earthquakes etc. (Hussain & Shafi, 2014).…”

“…One of the challenges that face manufacturing companies is operational risks. Operational risks are most prevalent in the manufacturing and mining industries (Qeke & Dubihlela, 2018;Bai, Gao & Sarkis, 2021). Manufacturing businesses encounter undesirable events and unwanted setbacks such as machine breakdowns, material shortages, accidents, and absenteeism that make the system unreliable and inconsistent (Islam & Tedford, 2012;Islam, Tedford & Haemmerle, 2008).…”

The Effect of Risk, R&D Intensity, Liquidity, and Inventory on Firm Performance during COVID-19: Evidence from US Manufacturing Industry

“…Focused more on description than prescription, it suggests that disasters damage production facilities and force retail operations to close, putting them at a disadvantage relative to firms not experiencing disaster; however, this disadvantage dissipates as surviving firms recover (Cainelli et al 2018;Cole et al 2019;De Mel et al 2012;Park et al 2013;Stromberg 2007). Notably, Bai et al (2020) lament the lack of studies that test predictors of performance-based outcomes.…”

“…Shin and Lee (2019) found that generic resources improve outcomes, with cash the most useful due to its versatility. Whether disruptions are caused by a human (e.g., fires started by accident) or nature also matters, with the former associated with larger stock price declines (Bai et al 2020).…”

Regional expansion of emerging market SMEs: the roles of domestic market environmental uncertainty and international alliance partner diversity

“…Market dynamism therefore intensifies the complexity of the organizational environment as firms need to collect more customer-and market-specific information to develop competitive strategies (Bai et al, 2021). Although these distinctive strategies are developed, firms are stratified in the same segment due to their adoption of similar strategies (Balietti & Riedl, 2021;Vadakkepatt et al, 2021).…”