Operational research applied in the field of public security

Abstract

Purpose Because that the crime in a wide way impacts the life of the people in the big metropolis, researchers have treated the question from several angles. The purpose of the paper, under the umbrella of operational research, is to develop a model of the ordering of police strategies, in the fight against crime in general, according to a certain criminal demand. Design/methodology/approach For the construction of the impact matrix of the strategies under the reduction of crime rates, considering a portfolio of crimes, a questionnaire applied to specialists was used. In a second moment, defined the criteria and strategies to be ordered, the multicriteria ELECTRE IV method was used, which with the help of the J-Electre software emulated the systematized data in the impact matrix and produced the final ordering of the most efficient strategies, in the fight against crime, in the perception of decision-makers. Findings As a result, the research revealed that policing strategies directed at solving specific crimes are the most effective in the perception of decision-makers after the emulation of data with the ELECTRE IV method. Research limitations/implications As research implications, it can be inferred that the use of multicriteria methods in the modeling of problems in the area of public security can contribute to rationalization of the use of the means available in the fight against crime in large cities. The research showed that it is possible to use customized policing strategies to a certain reality. Practical implications The method presented in this research is directly related to the major strategies: problem-oriented policing and hot spot policing. This method allows public safety managers to consider the possibility of combining different law enforcement strategies in each context. In this sense, the use of the multiple-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) (ELECTRE IV) method allows the evaluation of a large set of alternatives according to a set of established criteria, speeding up the process and reducing subjectivity, allowing the manager to analyze several scenarios with greater clarity and impartiality and choosing an alternative that best solves the proposed problem. The expected result is the rationalization of the available means applied in the search for the reduction of crime rates. Social implications The customization of policing strategies, according to criminal demands, implies the efficient way to reduce criminal charges. Reducing criminal rates enables the development of the local economy, tourism and the quality of life of people by exercising their freedom to the full. Originality/value The originality lies in filling a gap in the literature with the elaboration of the impact matrix of policing strategies in reducing criminal indices, and in their associated use in ordering strategies through a multicriteria method.

Multicriteria Decision-Making in Public Security: A Systematic Review

“…Fourthly, it examines which MCDM/A methods have been most utilized ( 4), seeking to identify potential gaps in the literature, such as the use of fuzzy sets. Lastly, it highlights which trends can be observed (5), offering insights and guidance for readers interested in the application of mathematical methods in decision-making. These questions are fundamental to promoting a comprehensive and detailed understanding of the use of MCDM/A in public security, contributing to the advancement of research and the improvement of decision-making practices in the field.…”

“…Given the complexity involved in managing practices for crime mitigation and control, the efficient allocation of resources is one of the most critical decisions. In this context, multicriteria decision-making methods are considered crucial in supporting the decisionmaker in the good allocation of such finite resources among competing alternatives [5][6][7]. Managers of police units constantly face the challenge of making decisions that impact police behavior, the effectiveness of crime suppression structures, and resource allocation among the different units.…”