2012
DOI: 10.1007/s11804-012-1141-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Operational options for green ships

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Energy efficiency, and thereby the reduction of emissions per unit of transport work, can be achieved via a number of operational and technical improvements (Faber et al, 2010;Kontovas & Psaraftis, 2011a;Notteboom, 2006;Psaraftis & Kontovas, 2013;Sherbaz & Duan, 2012); slow-steaming is among the most effective and easiest to implement (Corbett et al, 2009;Cariou, 2011;Faber et al, 2012;Lindstad et al, 2011;Meyer et al, 2012;Psaraftis & Kontovas, 2010;Tai & Lin, 2013), and it often comes with a negative CO 2 emission abatement cost. Due to the non-linear correlation between speed and fuel consumption (i.e., the so-called admiralty formula, which estimates a cube function, meaning a 10% speed reduction yields a 27% fuel consumption reduction), even a marginal speed reduction will result in a substantial fuel consumption reduction (Wang & Meng, 2012).…”
Section: Slow-steaming and Its Effects On Logisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Energy efficiency, and thereby the reduction of emissions per unit of transport work, can be achieved via a number of operational and technical improvements (Faber et al, 2010;Kontovas & Psaraftis, 2011a;Notteboom, 2006;Psaraftis & Kontovas, 2013;Sherbaz & Duan, 2012); slow-steaming is among the most effective and easiest to implement (Corbett et al, 2009;Cariou, 2011;Faber et al, 2012;Lindstad et al, 2011;Meyer et al, 2012;Psaraftis & Kontovas, 2010;Tai & Lin, 2013), and it often comes with a negative CO 2 emission abatement cost. Due to the non-linear correlation between speed and fuel consumption (i.e., the so-called admiralty formula, which estimates a cube function, meaning a 10% speed reduction yields a 27% fuel consumption reduction), even a marginal speed reduction will result in a substantial fuel consumption reduction (Wang & Meng, 2012).…”
Section: Slow-steaming and Its Effects On Logisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After the ship is put into use, its performance will decrease as the service time increases. Hull fouling is an important factor leading to the increase of resistance and fuel consumption [7]. It is reported that the fouling of ship hull can increase the resistance of the ship by about 25%-50% [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e prediction and treatment of hull fouling are essential for fuel saving. erefore, proper and timely cleaning can significantly reduce fuel consumption and improve ship efficiency [6][7][8][9]. Ship energy efficiency monitoring can support data analysis, identify abnormal states of ship energy efficiency, and guide crew operation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For ships with large transom sterns and bulbous bows, the power requirements for the best and worst trim may differ by more than 10% [5]. Model tests or CFD simulations have been used to assess the best trim and the effect of different trim conditions [6,7]. However, model tests are too costly and further efforts are required to improve the reliability and effectiveness of CFD simulations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%