2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ic.2008.12.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Operational domain theory and topology of sequential programming languages

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Side remark: Here we must also mention the "rational chains" of Escardó and Ho [8]. These are ascending sequences of PCF terms that can be defined syntactically by a PCF procedure.…”
Section: Semantics Of Pcf: Non-complete Partial Order F-modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Side remark: Here we must also mention the "rational chains" of Escardó and Ho [8]. These are ascending sequences of PCF terms that can be defined syntactically by a PCF procedure.…”
Section: Semantics Of Pcf: Non-complete Partial Order F-modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, we export domain-theoretic tools directly to the operational setting of FPC. Such an enterprise can be seen as an extension of earlier programs taken on by Mason et al (1996) and Escardó and Ho (2009) for the language PCF. As a foundation for our operational treatment of recursive types, we have put in place an operational domain-theoretic toolkit in the style of Pitts (1997) to suit the setting of FPC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We are interested in proving that (the semantics of) programs of first-order type R n → R enjoy first-order properties, such as continuity or differentiability, under their standard interpretation in calculus and real analysis. More specifically, our results do not cover notions of continuity and differentiability studied in fields such as (exact) real-number computation [57] or computable analysis [58], which have a strong domain-theoretical flavor, and higher-order generalizations of continuity and differentiability (see, e.g., [26,27,32,29]). We leave for future work the study of open logical relations in these settings.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%