2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2018.06.157
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Operational control of an integrated drum boiler of a coal fired thermal power plant

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where K 2 , T 2 , K 1 and T 1 are the characteristic parameters obtained when modelling the main steam temperature object [2]. When the CFBB load changes between 100% and 25%, the change range of the parameters in the transfer function of the leading zone and the inertia zone is K 1 is 0.5-0.8, T 1 is 80-100 seconds, K 2 is 1-2, and T 2 is 35-50 seconds.…”
Section: The Cfbb Main Steam Temperature Object Dynamic Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where K 2 , T 2 , K 1 and T 1 are the characteristic parameters obtained when modelling the main steam temperature object [2]. When the CFBB load changes between 100% and 25%, the change range of the parameters in the transfer function of the leading zone and the inertia zone is K 1 is 0.5-0.8, T 1 is 80-100 seconds, K 2 is 1-2, and T 2 is 35-50 seconds.…”
Section: The Cfbb Main Steam Temperature Object Dynamic Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many situations (like boiler), temperature control is associated with the liquid level of the tank giving rise to inverse response or nonminimum phase behaviour. 7 Combinations with similar or different geometry give rise to interactions between input and output in controlling liquid levels. A ˚stro¨m et al 8 formulated a mathematical model and used it for controlling liquid level for a quadruple tank system with similar cylindrical storage geometry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Successive optimal filtering/estimation for non-linear plants under theoretical and practical barriers with stochastic inputs is still in the developmental stage. 7,12 Unmodelled dynamics and changes in environmental conditions desire to update controller rather than process parameters through estimation techniques.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Performance of an MPC scheme depends predominantly on the choice of the model, that is, how good the model can predict the dynamic behaviour of the actual plant/process. There are variety of models available in the literature which are commonly used in MPC such as Hammerstein‐Wiener based model, input‐output data based model, operator theory based linear model, ARX model, ARMAX model, second‐order Volterra series model, ARX‐Volterra model, fuzzy rule based model, NN‐based model, ARX‐NN model, grey‐box model using state and output feedback, event‐driven observer‐based output‐feedback model, models obtained using support vector regression, and support vector machine techniques. Even though these models are quite useful and well established for predicting the behaviour of the actual system/process, they do not explicitly consider the effects of stochastic uncertainties like process and measurement noises, random variation in process parameters, stochastic disturbances, and unmodelled dynamics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%