Operational Considerations in the Development of Autonomy for Human Spaceflight

Crocker, Alan R.

doi:10.2514/6.2005-2733

Cited by 7 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Automation systems designers improved the HCI and human automation interaction (HAI) models either by introducing various models from different points of view [2,3,7,13,20,25,26,29,30] or by implementing the previously-introduced HCI and HAI models to practical automation problems [4,8,14,16,17,23]. Moreover, Ergonomists, Cognitive Engineers and Applied Psychologists continued to work on human side of automation systems [4,15,18,19,21,22].…”

mentioning

confidence: 97%

Challenges in implementation of human-automation interaction models

Fereidunian

Lucas

Lesani

et al. 2007

2007 Mediterranean Conference on Control &Amp; Automation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper presents the practical experience gained in the process of implementing the human-centered automation design methodology to an electric power utility management automation function, along with the analytical discussions on the implementation challenges. This report of implementation challenges and the discussions made on the methods devised to conquer those challenges lead to an alternative approach to the original approach to the well-known human-centered automation design model in the literature. Keywords: human-centered automation (HCA), human-computer interaction (HCI), human-automation interaction (HAI), type-level model (TLM), distribution automation (DA), utility management automation (UMA), feeder reconfiguration function (FRF), energy restoration, level of automation (LOA)

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 97%

Challenges in implementation of human-automation interaction models

Fereidunian

Lucas

Lesani

et al. 2007

2007 Mediterranean Conference on Control &Amp; Automation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…While the concept seems straightforward its implementation for various activities such as mission planning, selective flight control operations, or vehicle health management systems require special considerations. MOD has examined this concept [14], [17], and there are currently certain human activities within the MOD that are augmented with autonomous systems. [22].…”

Section: Tamu and Autonomymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…[22]. The examination of this concept has led to the recommendation for an adaptable and evolvable autonomy architecture which is well defined from the early phases of design [14]. TAMU design is based on the development of the workflow processes associated with flight products.…”

Section: Tamu and Autonomymentioning

confidence: 99%

TAMU: A New Space Mission Operations Paradigm

Meshkat

Ruszkowski

Haensly

et al. 2011

AIAA SPACE 2011 Conference &Amp; Exposition

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract:The Transferable, Adaptable, Modular and Upgradeable (TAMU) Flight Production Process (FPP) is a model-centric System of System (SoS) framework which cuts across multiple organizations and their associated facilities, that are, in the most general case, in geographically diverse locations, to develop the architecture and associated workflow processes for a broad range of mission operations. Further, TAMU FPP envisions the simulation, automatic execution and re-planning of orchestrated workflow processes as they become operational. This paper provides the vision for the TAMU FPP paradigm. This includes a complete, coherent technique, process and tool set that result in an infrastructure that can be used for full lifecycle design and decision making during any flight production process. A flight production process is the process of developing all products that are necessary for flight.

show abstract

“…These missions present unique challenges such as increased communication delays and spacecraft rendezvous in lunar and Martian orbits. To meet these challenges there must be an increased level of vehicle autonomy 1 over previous human spacecraft [2]. Because of limited crew sizes many of the increases in autonomy will be realized by the use of on-board automation 2 .…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…To meet these challenges there must be an increased level of vehicle autonomy 1 over previous human spacecraft [2]. Because of limited crew sizes many of the increases in autonomy will be realized by the use of on-board automation 2 . As a result, the CEV necessitates higher levels of automation than previous NASA vehicles.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%