2012
DOI: 10.5004/dwt.2012.3593
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Operation of the vertical subsurface flow and partly submersed stormwater wetland with an intermittent recycle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On average, the woodchips wetlands achieved dissolved nitrogen removal of 23% for NDD 2, 35% for NDD 4, and 54% for NDD 8. However, this result was different from that of the same woodchips wetlands treating stormwater from an urban zone [15], in which the nitrogen was reduced by 46, 52, and 26% for NDD 2, 4, and 8, respectively. This difference was likely due to the stormwater characteristics.…”
Section: Nitrogen Removalmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…On average, the woodchips wetlands achieved dissolved nitrogen removal of 23% for NDD 2, 35% for NDD 4, and 54% for NDD 8. However, this result was different from that of the same woodchips wetlands treating stormwater from an urban zone [15], in which the nitrogen was reduced by 46, 52, and 26% for NDD 2, 4, and 8, respectively. This difference was likely due to the stormwater characteristics.…”
Section: Nitrogen Removalmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…However, due to poor adsorption substrates used, the proportion of TP removal via adsorption was low. A study on VF equipped with different substrates in the runoff treatment by Chen et al [43] demonstrated under the same condition, volcanics received just 13.3% TP removal, much lower than woodchip (38.8%), pot gravel (64.4%), and synthetic fiber (74.5%).…”
Section: The Overall Performance Of Wetlandsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Usually, it is the most expensive component of the wetland and a proper filter media should not be considered only for the efficient removal of pollutants but also in terms of cost regarding construction and maintenance. Therefore, locally available resources have always been selected because they are economically viable and acceptable for use in the fields [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%