Objective: As a result of high risk of failure rate with cases of common peroneal nerve (CPN) palsy with nerve gap defect more than 6cms when managed by sural nerve graft alone so we preferred to proceed directly to tibialis posterior (T P) transfer and sural grafting in one step and evaluate results of common peroneal nerve lesions (CPN) displaying nonfunctional regenerative signs. When explored and Intraoperative decision making to manage the lesions either by primary microsurgical nerve repair or one step primary nerve repair and tibialis posterior transfer reconstructive surgery to provide the patient the best chances of sensory recovery and useful motor functional outcomes. Methods: Forty two patients with common peroneal nerve lesions were managed in Zagazig university hospital (2013-2017), every cases of CPN palsy before surgery, we mentioned the potential of TP transfer during the surgery in one step. 16 cases primary microsurgical nerve repair was done by external neurolysis or internal interfasicular neurolysis. 15 Cases explored, neuroma excision and nerve graft if gap nerve defect less than 6 m with good number of motor end plate evidenced by MUNE of anterior and lateral leg muscles. (11) Cases managed by autologous sural nerve graft and tibialis posterior transfer if gap nerve defect more than 6 m with few number of motor end plate evidenced by MUNE of anterior and lateral leg muscles and viable sensory receptor evidenced by SEVP. Results: The follow up range (20-60) months, patients were satisfied with motor recovery grade (4) and (5) of BMRC, so in (16) cases neurolysis their results were excellent and satisfied in (15/16) (92.5 %). (15) Cases gap defect less than 6 cms were managed with primary nerve repair with sural nerve graft length (3-9 cms) their results were good and satisfied in (12/15) (80%) (11) cases of nerve gap defect more than 6 cm were managed by one step T P tendon transfer and primary nerve repair with sural nerve graft length (9.5-12 cms) their results were excellent and satisfied in (10/11) (90.9). In our study (42) cases with CPN lesions were managed by primary nerve repair or primary nerve repair and secondary TP tendon transfer in one step their motor results were excellent and satisfied in(37/42 , 88.1%), regarding sensory recovery of CPN palsy after our procedures (20) cases described complete sensory recovery (47.6%) and considered excellent results, (17) cases improved sensory deficit (40.4%) and regarded as good results, (5) cases with unchanged sensory deficit (11.9 %) and considered bad result, good and excellent results were considered by the patients as satisfied results. So in our study (37) cases reported satisfied sensory recovery after our procedures (37/42-88.1%). Neuropathic pain was recorded in (16) cases of CPN palsy, after our surgical procedures (6) cases showed complete regression, (7) cases improved with reduction of neuropathic pain, (3) cases recorded as unchanged neuropathic pain and referred to pain control clinic to manage them (13/16 , 81.2 %). Sign...