Operating costs of agricultural holdings with equal production possibilities

Mičić, Ivan D.; Urošević, Dragana; Vujić, Radosav; Mičić, Ivana; Micic, Marko

doi:10.5937/ekopolj1602407m

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Due to the rising demand for cars in Yugoslavia, Zastava was able to continuously increase its output of passenger automobiles from 1069 in 1956 to 25,960 in 1964. 42 Furthermore, Zastava's success constituted a positive factor for the economy of Yugoslavia as a whole since, according to the Yugoslav model of the production process, the manufacturing of the critical car components was dispersed all over the country. While Zastava's cooperation with FIAT held out the promise of prosperity for all through technological advances, in practice, however, Zastava's many subcontractors either could not, or, would not keep up with Zastava's pace of development.…”

Section: Zastava's Transition and Phases Of Development: From Cannonsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Automotive factory ‘Crvena Zastava’: Yugoslav self-management socialism and challenges for national automobile industry

Stanković¹

2018

The Journal of Transport History

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In 1955 the Automotive Factory ‘Crvena Zastava’ (Red Flag factory) began to manufacture automobiles based on the FIAT license and became a driving force of the communist Yugoslavia transformation from an agrarian into industrialised, urban and motorised country. This paper explores Zastava’s experience of building and developing the Yugoslav automobile industry in the context of the Yugoslav self-management system from the 1950s to the 1980s. The article aims at showing that the concept of self-management was sensible in light of the multinational Yugoslavia break from the Soviet bloc, but that the net effect of its implementation proved problematic for the national automobile industry . Additionally, Zastava leadership attempts to achieve a larger industrial scale and financial autonomy clashed with the Yugoslavia trend towards decentralisation as much as the communist leadership’s fear of an alternative centre of power.

show abstract

Section: Zastava's Transition and Phases Of Development: From Cannonsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Automotive factory ‘Crvena Zastava’: Yugoslav self-management socialism and challenges for national automobile industry

Stanković¹

2018

The Journal of Transport History

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Micić presented the ten principles of Zenitism in the form of the Ten Commandments; the Zenitist second principle highlights zenith-art as everything related to what Micić called unspoiled, pure, and vital "barbaric genius" (barbarogenije). 37 In 1926, in "Manifest varvarima duha i misli na svom kontinentima" (Manifesto to the barbarians of spirit and thought on all continents), written in the language of the October Revolution, Micić proclaimed Zenitism a global artistic movement, a revolution that would "de-civilize" Europe on the model of barbarogenije. 38 Therefore, Micić rejected any form of traditional and religious authority and proclaimed in the Zenitist manifestoes that modern spirituality is not based on religious faith.…”

Section: Zenitism and Architecturementioning

confidence: 99%

Evocations of Byzantium in Zenitist Avant-Garde Architecture

Bogdanović

2016

Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Byzantine legacy in modern architecture can be divided between a historicist, neo-Byzantine architectural style and an active investigation of the potentials of the Byzantine for a modern, explicitly nontraditional, architecture. References to Byzantium in avantgarde Eastern European architecture of the 1920s employed a modernist interpretation of the Byzantine concept of space that evoked a mode of "medieval" experience and creative practice rather than direct historical quotation. The avant-garde movement of Zenitism, a prominent visionary avant-garde movement in the Balkans, provides a case study in the ways immaterial aspects of Byzantine architecture infiltrated modernism and moved it beyond an academic, reiterative formalism. By examining the visionary architectural design for the Zeniteum, the Zenitist center, in this article, I aim to identify how references to Byzantium were integrated in early twentieth-century Serbian avant-garde architecture and to address broader questions about interwar modernism. In the 1920s, architects, architectural historians, and promoters of architecture came to understand the Byzantine concept of space in ways that architects were able to use in distinctly non-Byzantine architecture. I will trace the ways Zenitism engaged the Byzantine architectural construct of total design, in which structure joins spirituality, and related philosophical concepts of meaning and form derived from both Byzantine and avant-garde architecture. This reassessment of Zenitism, an Eastern European architectural movement often placed on the margins of the history of modern architecture, has broad implications for our understanding of the relationship between tradition and modernism. Disciplines

show abstract

Operating costs of agricultural holdings with equal production possibilities

Abstract: Abstract

Cited by 2 publications

References 3 publications

Automotive factory ‘Crvena Zastava’: Yugoslav self-management socialism and challenges for national automobile industry

Automotive factory ‘Crvena Zastava’: Yugoslav self-management socialism and challenges for national automobile industry

Evocations of Byzantium in Zenitist Avant-Garde Architecture

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About