1988
DOI: 10.1109/3.962
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Operating characteristics of single-quantum-well AlGaAs/GaAs high-power lasers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(1 InGaAsP lasers [12] and also the stronger n th -dependence, the increase of total injection current is primarily due to the rapid increase of the Auger current with increasing loss within the linear region. However, the increase of n th becomes particularly severe with further increase of loss (toward the lower end of L) and an anomalous increase of η d -1 is observed for the device with the shortest cavity length (the largest loss), similar to previous reports [15][16][17]. This behaviour is related to the strong gain saturation at high injection current densities, typical for a QWs laser [18].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…(1 InGaAsP lasers [12] and also the stronger n th -dependence, the increase of total injection current is primarily due to the rapid increase of the Auger current with increasing loss within the linear region. However, the increase of n th becomes particularly severe with further increase of loss (toward the lower end of L) and an anomalous increase of η d -1 is observed for the device with the shortest cavity length (the largest loss), similar to previous reports [15][16][17]. This behaviour is related to the strong gain saturation at high injection current densities, typical for a QWs laser [18].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…These values are 2.7-3 times higher than those reported for symmetric GRIN structures not optimized for high-power operation [10]. For coated mirrors, these values should scale with a factor of 2.5 [8] or even 4-5 [12] and would correspond to at least about 88 mW/ m, which would be a factor of 2.7-3 times higher than for symmetric GRINSCH devices optimized for low threshold.…”
Section: Cod Degradation and Fundamental Mode Operationmentioning
confidence: 80%