1997
DOI: 10.2166/wst.1997.0436
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Operating characteristics of aerated submerged biofilm reactors for drinking water treatment

Abstract: As the quality of raw water deteriorates, a number of additional treatment techniques have been developed and adapted to water treatment for producing a safe and aesthetically satisfactory drinking water. One of the various alternatives is to use a biological process, such as a submerged bed filter, as the first process in the treatment train followed by conventional treatment processes. Biofilm process for the pretreatment of water is suitable for advanced treatment as the biofilm can keep microorganism, at l… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bioreactors such as aerated submerged biofilm reactors enhance microbial activity for biological nutrient removal by providing a surface for indigenous water microorganisms to attach and grow. Meanwhile, it could help to reduce microbial regrowth potential and formation of carcinogenic disinfection by‐products in drinking water distribution systems (Takasaki et al , 1990; Lim & Shin, 1997). Owing to the relatively low maintenance cost and effective dissolved organic matter and ammonia removal, biological pretreatment has become an attractive additional unit process in drinking water plants in China (Wang & Liu, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Bioreactors such as aerated submerged biofilm reactors enhance microbial activity for biological nutrient removal by providing a surface for indigenous water microorganisms to attach and grow. Meanwhile, it could help to reduce microbial regrowth potential and formation of carcinogenic disinfection by‐products in drinking water distribution systems (Takasaki et al , 1990; Lim & Shin, 1997). Owing to the relatively low maintenance cost and effective dissolved organic matter and ammonia removal, biological pretreatment has become an attractive additional unit process in drinking water plants in China (Wang & Liu, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although hundreds of biological reactors have been constructed for drinking water pretreatment in China, some of the processes had fluctuating nutrient removal efficiency (Wang & Liu, 1999). While several studies have focused on the impacts of various operating characteristics and design parameters on process performance (Lim & Shin, 1997; Wu, 1999), the microbial communities in the reactors, which directly govern the substrate utilization performance of the process, are poorly understood. Recently, molecular‐based techniques have been frequently and successfully used to study the bacterial community in a variety of habitats, including freshwater lakes (Sekiguchi et al , 2002) and estuaries (Bernhard et al , 2005), biological waste water treatment plants (Cole et al , 2002; Park & Noguera, 2004; Gómez‐Villalba et al , 2006) and biofilms in drinking water distribution systems (Lipponen et al , 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And compared with other packing processing system, BAF is not easy to be blocked [10] . Kyeong-Ho Lim from South Korea, in the 90s of the last century, began to research treatment by BAF for drinking water, efforts to control disinfection by-products formation and improve the safety of disinfection [11] . In China, although from the 90s of the 20th century ,we began extensive research on micro-polluted water by BAF pre-processing technology.…”
Section: Application Of Baf In Treatment Of Micro Polluted Watermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Membrane separation can effectively remove GSM and MIB from water at a relatively high operational expense, but the issue of surficial fouling is another major concern [ 7 , 8 ]. Using a biological process alone to remove GSM and MIB is not as effective, since the biodegradation rates of GSM and MIB are slow [ 9 , 10 ]. Although activated carbon is widely used in removing GSM, MIB, and IBMP, the co-existing natural organic matters in waterbodies can reduce its adsorption capacity for T&O compounds as well as the treatment efficiency [ 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%