2019
DOI: 10.2140/gt.2019.23.299
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Operads of genus zero curves and the Grothendieck–Teichmüller group

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proof is entirely analogous once we have an action of GT on the framed little disks operad. This is constructed in [BdBHR17,Theorem 8.4] and the effect of this action on homology is explained in [BdBHR17, Theorem 9.1].…”
Section: Main Results In the Homologically Graded Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proof is entirely analogous once we have an action of GT on the framed little disks operad. This is constructed in [BdBHR17,Theorem 8.4] and the effect of this action on homology is explained in [BdBHR17, Theorem 9.1].…”
Section: Main Results In the Homologically Graded Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We claim that the resulting operad is quasi‐isomorphic to C(D,double-struckF)$C_*(\mathcal {D},\mathbb {F}_\ell )$. The exact same statement for the framed little disks operad is proved in [7, Theorem 9.1]. The group GT̂$\widehat{GT}$ comes with a surjective map χ:trueGT̂Z×\begin{equation*} \chi _\ell :\widehat{GT}\rightarrow \mathbb {Z}_\ell ^\times \end{equation*}that factors the cyclotomic character of the absolute Galois group of Q$\mathbb {Q}$ (see [38, section 3.1]).…”
Section: Main Results In the Homologically Graded Casementioning
confidence: 56%
“…This follows from Theorem E.3.1.6 of [Lur], which states that the functor between the underlying ∞-categories of s Set Q and sSet KQ induced by U (which is called "Mat" by Lurie) is conservative. Another way to deduce this proposition is to show that the weak equivalences between fibrant objects in s Set Q are the π * -isomorphisms (as in the proof of Proposition 3.9 of [BHR19]) and that the the underlying group/set Uπ n (X, x) of the profinite group/set π n (X, x) agrees with π n (UX, x) for any fibrant X ∈ s Set Q and any x ∈ X 0 .…”
Section: Example: Complete Segal Profinite Spaces Vs Profinite Quasic...mentioning
confidence: 99%