2018
DOI: 10.3389/frma.2017.00012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

OpenVIVO: Transparency in Scholarship

Abstract: OpenVIVO is a free and open-hosted semantic web platform that anyone can join and that gathers and shares open data about scholarship in the world. OpenVIVO, based on the VIVO open-source platform, provides transparent access to data about the scholarly work of its participants. OpenVIVO demonstrates the use of persistent identifiers, the automatic real-time ingest of scholarly ecosystem metadata, the use of VIVO-ISF and related ontologies, the attribution of work, and the publication and reuse of data-all cri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
(4 reference statements)
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The CRO was first implemented into the OpenVIVO scholar profile system, which is used to openly track and share information about scholarly contributions in a web-based platform. As noted by Ilik et al "this ontology extends the contributions to scholarship beyond manuscript authorship to capture the broadening of researchers' participation in scientific discoveries that have not been previously recognized by traditional measures of scholarly impact" (Ilik et al 2018). The work done included reviewing existing scholarly contribution taxonomies and exploring ways to extend the CRediT taxonomy to create a prototype contributorship model that covers a wide selection of fields of research.…”
Section: Making Contributorship Work In Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CRO was first implemented into the OpenVIVO scholar profile system, which is used to openly track and share information about scholarly contributions in a web-based platform. As noted by Ilik et al "this ontology extends the contributions to scholarship beyond manuscript authorship to capture the broadening of researchers' participation in scientific discoveries that have not been previously recognized by traditional measures of scholarly impact" (Ilik et al 2018). The work done included reviewing existing scholarly contribution taxonomies and exploring ways to extend the CRediT taxonomy to create a prototype contributorship model that covers a wide selection of fields of research.…”
Section: Making Contributorship Work In Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An ontology of roles that is both broader than those of CRediT and also more specific has been developed by the National Center for Data to Health, an initiative of the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS) at the National Institutes of Health (Vasilevsky et al, 2020). The scheme is called the Contributor Role Ontology (CRO, https://data2health.github.io/contributor-roleontology/), and it extends the CRediT ontology to include more than fifty roles, including "specimen collection", "librarian", "community engagement", "coordination", and "software testing" (https://www.force11.org/blog/introducing-contribution-role-ontology-developingsustainable-community-driven-approach; Vasilevsky et al, 2020;Ilik et al, 2018). Given the adoption of CRediT that has already occurred, we anticipate that improvements will occur via extensions or generalizations such as CRO.…”
Section: The Future Of Contributorshipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One strategy for elevating the academic value of curatorial actions is to create the necessary infrastructure that captures the breadth of activities undertaken by curatorial staff. Several programs exist for aggregating metrics for research products other than publications, such as ImpactStory (Priem and Piwowar, 2012), OpenVIVO (Ilik et al, 2018), Bloodhound 1 , and Altmetric. Thus, there is already infrastructure in place for aggregating these data, if the e-infrastructure for creation of these data is available.…”
Section: Background and Rationalementioning
confidence: 99%