2008
DOI: 10.1007/s11077-008-9066-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

‘Opening up’ policy to reflexive appraisal: a role for Q Methodology? A case study of fire management in Cape York, Australia

Abstract: Q Methodology, Fire, Cape York, Discourse, Reflexivity, Opening up, Policy appraisal, Aboriginal land management, Australia,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
73
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
0
73
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, in the context of a mail survey it is unlikely individuals listed all factors they considered but more likely listed only the most salient ones. Alternative methods, such as Q-methodology or latent structure analysis could provide an improved alternative method to identifying the discourses individuals are using in talking about their climate change policy support and rejection (Ockwell, 2008;Webler et al, 2009). Further research and innovative designs must be employed to shed light on the underlying processes of differential public opinion formation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, in the context of a mail survey it is unlikely individuals listed all factors they considered but more likely listed only the most salient ones. Alternative methods, such as Q-methodology or latent structure analysis could provide an improved alternative method to identifying the discourses individuals are using in talking about their climate change policy support and rejection (Ockwell, 2008;Webler et al, 2009). Further research and innovative designs must be employed to shed light on the underlying processes of differential public opinion formation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This methodology has been applied in various fields such as political science, environment, sustainability sciences, health economics and energy sector for the study of subjectivity (Dryzek and Berejikian, 1993, Brown, 1980, Barry and Proops, 1999, Addams and Proops, 2000, Baker et al, 2006, Hooker-Clarke, 2005, Ockwell, 2008, Takshe et al, 2009, Cuppen, 2010.…”
Section: Q-methodology and How We Applied Itmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, Q methodology finds clusters of people whose similar overall attitudes shed light on what goes with what (and what does not) and why. The emphasis on people's underlying predispositions that give rise to an issue position contrasts with a focus on extant discourses with which people may identify (Dryzek and Niemeyer 2008;Ockwell 2008). Looking first to people's underlying dispositions is useful when new issues emerge in manifestly value-complicated settings, where one may expect discourses to be in dynamic and emergent states.…”
Section: The Potential For Q Methodology In the Early Stages Of Engagmentioning
confidence: 99%