2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsis.2010.09.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Opening up design science: The challenge of designing for reuse and joint development

Abstract: This is the accepted version of the paper.This version of the publication may differ from the final published version. Permanent repository link AbstractThe purpose of this paper is to advance design science by developing a framework for research on reuse and the relationship between external IT artifacts and their users. A design science approach to IS research needs to grapple with the fact that a number of relevant, economically attractive, external IT artifacts cannot be designed from scratch nor meaningf… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
6
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…However, many authors talk about the business model without further defining it or elaborating on it in this common use pattern (eg, Soh, Markus, & Goh, ). In most cases, this type of application was associated with illustrating change in the ways of doing business, a change that was induced by technological (ie, IT‐driven) or societal shifts (eg, von Krogh & Haefliger, ; Zahra & George, ). In this case, the business model concept is neither used in‐depth in the theoretical foundations nor in the method section.…”
Section: Review Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, many authors talk about the business model without further defining it or elaborating on it in this common use pattern (eg, Soh, Markus, & Goh, ). In most cases, this type of application was associated with illustrating change in the ways of doing business, a change that was induced by technological (ie, IT‐driven) or societal shifts (eg, von Krogh & Haefliger, ; Zahra & George, ). In this case, the business model concept is neither used in‐depth in the theoretical foundations nor in the method section.…”
Section: Review Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Internal dynamics in online communities of creation are not well understood. Theory that explains how resources enter and leave online communities (Faraj et al, 2011), how authority plays out in online communities (Dahlander and O'Mahony, 2011), how online communities relate to firms (Colombo et al, 2012), and how firms can collaborate with online communities in fruitful ways (Jarvenpaa and Majchrzak, 2010;von Krogh and Haefliger, 2010) is still in its infancy. The practice lens adopted here joins recent work in theorizing organizational dynamics (Feldman and Orlikowski, 2011) with respect to the enactment of organizational reality in daily work, which holds important implications for theorizing technology in use and as an agent of change in organizations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Open innovation encompasses both supplier-side as well as customer-side innovation. Open source software emerged as a dominant paradigm in supplier-driven innovation [1,22]. Value co-creation has similarly emerged as an important area in customer-driven product and service innovation [4,17].…”
Section: The Role Of Technology In Innovationmentioning
confidence: 99%