2022
DOI: 10.1177/13623613221105385
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Opening up autism research: Bringing open research methods to our field

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Notwithstanding these limitations, a key strength of the present study was its strong adoption of an open-science approach, including pre-registration of our research questions, sample size, and analysis plans, and the sharing of the dataset and analysis code. As such, it was a major improvement to Oredipe et al (2023) , as well as other studies with autistic adults, towards a stronger, robust evidence base in autism research more generally ( Hobson et al, 2022 ). Furthermore, our data may serve as a substantial resource for future studies on QoL in autism and contribute to prospective meta-analytic work on this topic.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Notwithstanding these limitations, a key strength of the present study was its strong adoption of an open-science approach, including pre-registration of our research questions, sample size, and analysis plans, and the sharing of the dataset and analysis code. As such, it was a major improvement to Oredipe et al (2023) , as well as other studies with autistic adults, towards a stronger, robust evidence base in autism research more generally ( Hobson et al, 2022 ). Furthermore, our data may serve as a substantial resource for future studies on QoL in autism and contribute to prospective meta-analytic work on this topic.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Given the multiple chinks in the DEP theory’s derivation chain—that is, an unclear theoretical concept, poor measures, and unexplored boundary conditions (Figure 1B)—it is currently impossible to make sufficiently strong statistical predictions about the direction or size of any effects. This issue is compounded by a dearth of open science practices in autism and clinical psychological science (Hobson et al, 2022; Tackett et al, 2019), with almost no published DEP studies having preregistered their hypotheses (apart from Crompton, Ropar, et al, 2020). Taken together, predictions made by the DEP theory are ill-defined and therefore challenging to falsify or corroborate, reflecting wider issues in psychological science (see Scheel, 2022).…”
Section: Fuzzy Theoretical Conceptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These lessons begin with context and acknowledgment of power and as the expert insider, it is important to reiterate that to facilitate change, those who lack power (the autistic) must reposition themselves away from objects of research and become the dialogists for their people. We can say with some certainty that this presents itself as a search for 'epistemic injustice' which is important; as to dispel the myths that exist about autistic people which persist in research of this kind there must be a reckoning; as there are those who believe in the myths of ignorance and there are those who cannot recognize them (Hobson et al, 2022(Hobson et al, , p. 1012. But by virtue of the adoption of closed research methods in eliciting autistic voices, they all are slaves to those myths (Ridout, 2017).…”
Section: Checking Oneself In the Discoursementioning
confidence: 99%