2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2011.03.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Opening the black box: The adoption of innovations in the voluntary sector—The case of Indonesian civil society organisations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
18
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…According to this view, rather than tapping into underserved consumers, grassroots innovators aspire to address problems that are essentially and primarily social [60] providing appropriate [43], socially acceptable [5] and environmentally sustainable [66] solutions. According to Gupta [67] and Fressoli et al [68], including grassroots entrepreneurship and innovation within the range of public policy would not only lead to the delivery of affordable products/services but also to the strengthening of the activity of actors such as Civil Society Organizations (CSO) [69] and NGOs [70], empower local communities [71][72][73][74][75] fill institutional voids [76,77] and promote more inclusive patterns of development [78,79].…”
Section: The Research Agenda Emerging From the Bop: Who Innovates Formentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to this view, rather than tapping into underserved consumers, grassroots innovators aspire to address problems that are essentially and primarily social [60] providing appropriate [43], socially acceptable [5] and environmentally sustainable [66] solutions. According to Gupta [67] and Fressoli et al [68], including grassroots entrepreneurship and innovation within the range of public policy would not only lead to the delivery of affordable products/services but also to the strengthening of the activity of actors such as Civil Society Organizations (CSO) [69] and NGOs [70], empower local communities [71][72][73][74][75] fill institutional voids [76,77] and promote more inclusive patterns of development [78,79].…”
Section: The Research Agenda Emerging From the Bop: Who Innovates Formentioning
confidence: 99%
“…-Aspects related to the organizational culture in public institutions: habits in the public procurement proceedings The low level of knowledge of the personnel within the contracting authorities concerning the role and importance of the activities with social objectives for the community generates disinterest in facilitating the award of public contracts in favour of SEs. Contracting authorities prefer awarding public contracts based on the lowest price, avoiding, for reasons of simplification of the public procurement proceedings, to use calculation algorithms which include several tender assessment factors (Nugroho 2011;Palmujoki et al 2010;Muñoz 2009;Muñoz and Tinsley 2008). -Additional costs generated by the award of public contracts to SE The facilitation of the access of SEs to the public procurement market, by using specific tools, could generate adverse effects, from the perspective of the breach of the principle of free competition, of the emergence of inequalities among economic operators and of the inefficient redistribution of resources.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Esta preocupación ha sido poco explorada en la amplia literatura sobre economía de la innovación, sin embargo, una parte importante de las categorías que se utilizan para analizar la organización económica son pertinentes para explicar el comportamiento innovador de las organizaciones públicas. Para Nugroho (2011), lo que importa no es la motivación del beneficio sino cómo se adoptan y difunden las ideas para lograr metas sociales más amplias.…”
Section: De La Difusión a La Capacidad De Absorción En Los Procesos Dunclassified