2020
DOI: 10.1086/705903
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Opening the Black Box of the Matching Function: The Power of Words

Abstract: How do employers attract the right workers? How important are posted wages vs. other job characteristics?Using data from the leading job board CareerBuilder.com, we show that most vacancies do not post wages, and, for those that do, job titles explain more than 90% of the wage variance. Job titles also explain more than 80% of the across-vacancies variance in the education and experience of applicants. Finally, failing to control for job titles leads to a spurious negative elasticity of labor supply. Thus, our… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
76
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
5
76
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in line with recent work by Pries & Rogerson (2019) who argue that improvements in employer screening (i.e. online employment tests) can explain the observed fall in job-to-job mobility in the U.S. Another implication 7 Interestingly, Atasoy (2013) finds a strong association between internet access and employment in the U.S. 8 This is broadly consistent with evidence from survey data or online platforms showing that vacancies postings with higher wages receive more applications (e.g., Wolthoff, 2016 andBanfi &Villena-Roldan, 2018). Other related studies of vacancy posting behavior use survey data (e.g., Holzer et al , 1991, van Ours & Ridder, 1991, Van Ours & Ridder, 1992, Burdett & Cunningham, 1998, Davis et al , 2014, Faberman & Menzio, 2018, or microdata from online job boards (e.g., Barron et al , 1997, Modestino et al , 2016, Hershbein & Kahn, 2018.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…This is in line with recent work by Pries & Rogerson (2019) who argue that improvements in employer screening (i.e. online employment tests) can explain the observed fall in job-to-job mobility in the U.S. Another implication 7 Interestingly, Atasoy (2013) finds a strong association between internet access and employment in the U.S. 8 This is broadly consistent with evidence from survey data or online platforms showing that vacancies postings with higher wages receive more applications (e.g., Wolthoff, 2016 andBanfi &Villena-Roldan, 2018). Other related studies of vacancy posting behavior use survey data (e.g., Holzer et al , 1991, van Ours & Ridder, 1991, Van Ours & Ridder, 1992, Burdett & Cunningham, 1998, Davis et al , 2014, Faberman & Menzio, 2018, or microdata from online job boards (e.g., Barron et al , 1997, Modestino et al , 2016, Hershbein & Kahn, 2018.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…We now address the representativity of the data. Background work (Marinescu and Wolthoff, 2015) was done to compare the industry distribution of job vacancies in CareerBuilder.com with the distribution in Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey (JOLTS). Compared to the distribution of vacancies across industries in JOLTS, some industries are overrepresented in Ca-reerBuilder data, in particular information technology, finance and insurance, and real estate, rental and leasing.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DFH; van Ours and Ridder (1991); van Ours and Ridder (1992); Holzer (1994); Gorter, Nijkamp and Rietveld (1996); Burdett and Cunningham (1998); Dickerson (2003); Davis, Röttger, Warning and Weber (2014); Faberman and Menzio (2018)) or online job board data (e.g. Barron, Berger and Black (1999); Banfi and Villena-Roldan (2016); Marinescu and Wolthoff (2016); Marinescu (2017); Modestino, Shoag and Ballance (2017); Hershbein and Kahn (2018); see also Kuhn (2014) for a general discussion of internet job search). A few earlier studies also use administrative data on vacancies, e.g.…”
Section: Related Empirical Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%