Proceedings of the International Conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems - Volume 2001 2001
DOI: 10.1145/505168.505169
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Opening plenary talk: Recent advances in metaphysics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ontological theories usually try to determine what categories there are and what the formal relations between categories are; is for example some category dependent of another (e.g. Loux, 1998;Lowe, 2001;Keinänen, 2008).…”
Section: What the Ontology For Philosophy Of Education Could Be?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ontological theories usually try to determine what categories there are and what the formal relations between categories are; is for example some category dependent of another (e.g. Loux, 1998;Lowe, 2001;Keinänen, 2008).…”
Section: What the Ontology For Philosophy Of Education Could Be?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lowe (1998b: Chap. 9, 1998c, 2001, 2002a, 2002b, 2003a has developed a 'four-category ontology' whose fundamental ontological categories result from two distinctions: between object and property and between particular and universal. In Lowe's metaphysical scheme, inspired by Aristotle's distinction between primary and secondary substances, there are two fundamentally different types of individual objects: particular objects, such as rocks, animals and persons, and universal objects, the most important instances of which are kinds, such as the kind oak trees or the kind gold.…”
Section: Max Kistlermentioning
confidence: 99%