2019
DOI: 10.1101/794297
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

OpenCRAVAT, an open source collaborative platform for the annotation of human genetic variation

Abstract: PURPOSEThe modern researcher is confronted with hundreds of published methods to interpret genetic variants. There are databases of genes and variants, phenotype-genotype relationships, algorithms that score and rank genes, and in silico variant effect prediction tools. Because variant prioritization is a multi-factorial problem, a welcome development in the field has been the emergence of decision support frameworks, which make it easier to integrate multiple resources in an interactive environment. Current d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, all features were extracted again using the above-mentioned methodology, comprising 4244 mutations with a complete feature set. These mutations were inputted into CHASMplus (v1.2.0) classifier via OpenCRAVAT web server [ 40 ], this approach being considered one of the best scoring state-of-the-art models which has outclassed other methodologies [ 13 ]. The output comprised 1578 mutations and a score that represents the probability of a mutation of being a driver.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Consequently, all features were extracted again using the above-mentioned methodology, comprising 4244 mutations with a complete feature set. These mutations were inputted into CHASMplus (v1.2.0) classifier via OpenCRAVAT web server [ 40 ], this approach being considered one of the best scoring state-of-the-art models which has outclassed other methodologies [ 13 ]. The output comprised 1578 mutations and a score that represents the probability of a mutation of being a driver.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The combined annotation was mainly based on the Catalogue Of Somatic Mutations In Cancer (COSMIC, v75), classifying mutations into neutral and non-neutral [ 39 ], thus for the present evaluation, these represented the true class labels. Performance assessment was done using the random forest model to predict on the benchmark dataset, while also using CHASMplus (v1.2.0) through Open Custom Ranked Analysis of Variants Toolkit (OpenCRAVAT) web server for extracting the mutation probability of being a driver [ 40 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plasma variants were cross-referenced against the Catalogue of Somatic Mutations in Cancer (COSMIC) v95 database for the annotation of hotspot alterations using OpenCRAVAT (26). A conservative COSMIC frequency threshold of 25 hits was used to define a lung cancer hotspot with high confidence (8,27).…”
Section: Cohort Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ANNOVAR (Wang et al, 2010), Ensembl-VEP (McLaren et al, 2016), and SnpEff (Cingolani et al, 2012) were developed as annotation tools for variants function based on population frequencies in normal or disease cohorts, as well as damage predictions at genomic level. PCAWG-Scout (Goldman et al, 2020a), UCSC Xena (Goldman et al, 2020b), and OpenCRAVAT (Pagel et al, 2020) were designed for complex visualization and analysis services of large scale cancer datasets. PCGR (Nakken et al, 2018), GenomeChronicler (Guerra-Assuncao et al, 2020), and PORI (Reisle et al, 2022) were developed for cancer genome annotation at the individual patient level, providing many useful functions, such as mutation signature analysis, mutation burden analysis, drug interactions, as well as clinical trials analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%