2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.gca.2016.02.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Open system sulphate reduction in a diagenetic environment – Isotopic analysis of barite (δ34S and δ18O) and pyrite (δ34S) from the Tom and Jason Late Devonian Zn–Pb–Ba deposits, Selwyn Basin, Canada

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
54
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
1
54
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, the sulfur isotopic composition of pyrite is used to distinguish the diagenetic and syngenetic pyrite populations. The value of δ 34 S in syngenetic pyrite is generally negative, while the value of δ 34 S in diagenetic pyrite is positive [32,35]. Additionally, the average value of δ 34 S measured from the pyrite of the marine shales is 4.15% , which is similar to the average value of δ 34 S measured from sulfate (2.19% ) in the south of China [36].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In general, the sulfur isotopic composition of pyrite is used to distinguish the diagenetic and syngenetic pyrite populations. The value of δ 34 S in syngenetic pyrite is generally negative, while the value of δ 34 S in diagenetic pyrite is positive [32,35]. Additionally, the average value of δ 34 S measured from the pyrite of the marine shales is 4.15% , which is similar to the average value of δ 34 S measured from sulfate (2.19% ) in the south of China [36].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Additionally, the euhedral pyrites or the pyritic masses may be derived from the overgrowth of diagenetic framboids (Figure 1c) [30,31]. The euhedral pyrites, pyritic masses, infilled framboids, overgrown framboids, polyframboid aggregates and stratiform pyrites are formed during the diagenetic stage with more positive δ 34 S values [32][33][34]. (b) formation mechanism of early diagenetic pyrites under the oxic-dysoxic depositional conditions [22]; (c) formation mechanism of late diagenetic pyrites in the deep burial stage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If prolonged periods of stagnation existed in the Selwyn Basin prior to the introduction of metalliferous hydrothermal fluids, then this should be recorded in the paragenetically earliest sulfide. This is not the case as both localities, in their respective mineralized time-stratigraphic horizons, contain framboids with negative δ 34 S values (this study; Magnall et al 2016). Goodfellow (1987) andTurner (1992) propose that the HPD and MacMillan pass deposits formed in response to global anoxic events, but paragenetically distinct sulfur isotope compositions demonstrate that the secular pyrite trend does not reflect the sulfur cycle evolution in the Selwyn Basin.…”
Section: Secular Distribution Of Sulfur Isotopes and Depositional Envmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Framboids there possess light sulfur isotope compositions (ca. −25 ‰) and paragenetically later pyrite possesses positive δ 34 S values (≫ 0 ‰; Magnall et al 2016). This is significant because both the HPD and MacMillan Pass deposits are type localities that Goodfellow (1987) used to define the pyrite secular trend.…”
Section: Secular Distribution Of Sulfur Isotopes and Depositional Envmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation