Open subcondylar osteotomy in the treatment of mandibular deformities

Berényi, B

doi:10.1016/s0300-9785(73)80046-8

Cited by 8 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…3,[5][6][7] Other advantages of the IVRO include a lower incidence of damage to the inferior alveolar nerve, technical simplicity, condylar positioning, and reduced operating time. [8][9][10][11] Drawbacks to the IVRO include difÞ culty in mandibular advancement due to a lack of bony contact, increased risk of vascular injury at the osteotomy site near the sigmoid notch, and potential need for maxillomandibular Þ xation. 3 The BSSO was introduced by Trauner and Obwegeser in 1957 3,12 and has since received multiple modiÞ cations.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Facial Nerve Palsy following Mandibular Setback: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

Surpure¹,

Romney²,

Desai³

2014

Am J Cosmet Surg

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: Mandibular prognathism is a common dentofacial deformity that is often treated with orthognathic surgery (jaw straightening or corrective jaw surgery). The two most common types of operations to correct mandibular prognathism are the mandibular bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) and/or the intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy (IVRO). Although there are other surgeries that exist to correct this type of deformity, the BSSO and IVRO are the most commonly used treatment options. The advantages and disadvantages to each of these procedures are generally well documented in the literature. However, facial nerve palsy is an infrequent and less commonly reported complication of these two types of surgeries. We provide a case report of one such instance of total unilateral facial nerve palsy following mandibular BSSO. Materials and Methods: A 20-year-old man with mandibular prognathism underwent mandibular setback surgery via a bilateral mandibular sagittal split osteotomy. His surgery was complicated by a right-sided mandibular buccal plate fracture intraoperatively and a severe unilateral right-sided cranial nerve VII palsy postoperatively. Results: While still admitted to the hospital, the patient was noted to have a right-sided palsy of all branches of the facial nerve. This facial nerve palsy continued to persist on an outpatient basis, although the patient ultimately had full resolution of his right-sided facial nerve palsy at 10 months postoperatively. Conclusions: The complication of facial nerve palsy may be devastating to a patient, especially when the procedure is deemed elective. Although the exact mechanism is unknown, facial nerve palsy secondary to mandibular surgery is most likely related to the close proximity of the field of operation to the anatomy of the facial nerve. This assumption is supported by the lack of documented cases of facial nerve palsy from maxillary orthognathic surgery. Although rare, the authors feel that the risk of facial nerve injury should be discussed with the patient when mandibular surgery is planned.

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 99%