2010
DOI: 10.1080/19475701003643458
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Open standards-based geoprocessing Web services support the study and management of hazard and risk

Abstract: Over the last 15 years, and particularly in the last 5 years, a robust framework of open geoprocessing standards and sensor web enablement standards has been developed by the OGC, an open, consensus-based standards development organization, in close cooperation with other standards development organizations. These standards have been implemented by developers in a wide variety of commercially successful geoprocessing software products and Web services. The standards are coming into wide use in domains of activ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With the OWS family a robust framework of open geo processing standards has been developed by the OGC that have been implemented by developers in a wide variety of successful geo processing software products [Reichardt 2010]. The usage of OWS in geospatial information technology systems is a best practice that has been adopted for modern geospatial EWS serving the upstream information flow (Fig.…”
Section: Generic Web Processing Servicementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With the OWS family a robust framework of open geo processing standards has been developed by the OGC that have been implemented by developers in a wide variety of successful geo processing software products [Reichardt 2010]. The usage of OWS in geospatial information technology systems is a best practice that has been adopted for modern geospatial EWS serving the upstream information flow (Fig.…”
Section: Generic Web Processing Servicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…While a-g constitute the result set of intersection matrices, matrix h describes a special case which is excluded from the result set since no Interior is intersected defining a standardized interface that facilitates the publishing of geospatial processes [OGC 2007], is best suited to serve as service facade for the new service named Affected Area Identification Service (AAIS). Interchange of geographic information is fostered by OGC Geography Markup Language (GML) that provides a means of encoding geographic information for data transport and data storage [Reichardt 2010] and that is used as complex geospatial data type in WPS method signatures.…”
Section: Generic Web Processing Servicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, these resources can be reused to support the collaborative solving of complex geographic problems. Regarding this aspect, the Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC) has proposed several service description specifications such as the Web Map Service (WMS), Web Feature Service (WFS), Web Coverage Service (WCS) and Web Processing Service (WPS) implementation standards (Botts et al, ; Granell et al, ; Reichardt, ). These service specifications are widely used in the field of geographic modeling and model‐related data (i.e., the raw data related to models, including input data, output data and control parameters) sharing in the open web environment; sample applications include the 52° North project (http://52north.org/) and Quantum GIS (QGIS) (QGIS Development Team, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include: the use of different data models and terminologies representing different types of natural hazards, the use of specific local or national classification systems, the use of different data formats and data descriptions (metadata profiles) and the use of diverse coordinate reference systems. All these factors pose barriers to making data discoverable and interoperable (INSPIRE 2013b;Reichardt 2010).…”
Section: Common Data Model For Natural Hazards To Facilitate Cross-domentioning
confidence: 99%