Open source software use in libraries

Abstract

Purpose -In order to provide a general context for library implementations of open source software (OSS), the purpose of this paper is to discuss the existing presence of OSS in libraries, the functionality and variety of OSS products, and the need for further study into the application of OSS technologies in libraries. Design/methodology/approach -The paper is based on a literature review. Findings -This paper endeavors to provide a broad overview of the deepening relationship between libraries and OSS. Libraries are seeking alternatives to proprietary applications which may require specialized support and/or services. Moreover, OSS and proprietary products have a functional verisimilitude, and, as proprietary applications developers anticipate user needs, so too do OSS contributors. Practical implications -The degree of variance between proprietary and OSS applications, features, support, and compatibility is continually lessening, so libraries are increasingly making use of less costly alternatives to subscription based tools. Originality/value -The use of OSS in libraries is an increasing trend. OSS tools and implementations provide library institutions with access to a dynamic and cost effective solution for servicing user groups, manipulating large volumes of content, and facilitating communications between various institutional and public entities. This paper gives an holistic perspective albeit in a short form.

Open Source Software solutions in Indian libraries

“…He also reported that though his survey indicated a fall in the interest in OSS ILMS, when compared to previous surveys, many libraries indicated interest in migrating to OSS ILMS. Payne and Singh (2010) found that libraries were seeking alternatives to 410 LHT 32,3…”

“…He also reported that though his survey indicated a fall in the interest in OSS ILMS, when compared to previous surveys, many libraries indicated interest in migrating to OSS ILMS. Payne and Singh (2010) found that libraries were seeking alternatives to proprietary applications and indicated eagerness to adopt OSS solutions. Poulter (2010) observed that OSS aids libraries and had great potential but was hobbled by its intrinsically technical appeal.…”

The current state of library open source software research

“…As today's libraries face shrinking budgets and an ever-increasing need for technology, there has been a growing interest in and adoption of OSS in the library community (Donnelly, 2010). The benefits of OSS, such as greater flexibility and lower costs, are compelling more libraries to turn to this "attractive" option (Payne and Singh, 2010). Some examples of OSS widely adopted by libraries include Koha and Evergreen (ILS), Greenstone and DSpace (digital repository systems), and Blacklight and VuFind (OPACs).…”

Adoção de Software de Código Aberto: Uma Revisão Sistemática da Literatura

“…[Bouras et al 2012] estabeleceram comparações entre SCA e SP, destacando fatores técnicos, sociais, econômicos e organizacionais. Já o trabalho de [Payne and Singh 2010] pesquisou sobre uso de SCA em bibliotecas, destaque para funcionalidades, variedades de softwares, fatores motivadores e inibidores.…”