2020
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1516/1/012042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Open source software implementation in peer assessment

Abstract: The objective of the research was to implement the Open Source Software in learning assessment. The assessment was a peer assessment. The peer assessment used iPeer 3.4 software, widely known as open source software. The iPeer 3.4 is a web based software, therefore it can be accessed anywhere through various existing devices. iPeer 3.4 was implemented in the course with two different groups of students, and survey was conducted on the assessment and the process of the assessment. The software has undergone the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Self-assessment Self-assessment "software tool" Borg & Edmett, 2018;Harrison & Murray, 2014;Lubas, 2016;McEvoy et al, 2010;Sleem et al, 2010 Peer assessment "software for peer" review OR assessment Abdulla, 2008;Setemen et al, 2020;Sirait & Marlina, 2018 Survey Adaptability (Usability AND flexibility) OR "Suitability for individualization" "software tools" Bevan et al, 2016;Rahayu et al, 2018 Generate/ Assign Groups "software tool" assignment groups Balderas et al, 2018;Restrepo-Calle et al, 2019 Question type "question type" importance software tool Iqbal et al, 2016;Lucia et al, 2009 Restrictions of score -- Luaces et al, 2017;Vossen, 2018 Mailing notifications "mail notification" software tool Iqbal et al, 2016;Lucia et al, 2009 Weighting "weight marks" software Wahid et al, 2017;Singh et al, 2016;Alturki, 2016 Display Results -- Wahid et al, 2017 Reports "automatic report" software tool Hicks et al, 2018;Hyung et al, 2003;Safdari et al, 2016;Bauriaud et al, 2018;Raza et al, n.d Consequently, it is important to analyse the other parameters since they have discrepancies between them. Having stated that, none of the tools has implemented the "Restricted Scales" parameter.…”
Section: Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Self-assessment Self-assessment "software tool" Borg & Edmett, 2018;Harrison & Murray, 2014;Lubas, 2016;McEvoy et al, 2010;Sleem et al, 2010 Peer assessment "software for peer" review OR assessment Abdulla, 2008;Setemen et al, 2020;Sirait & Marlina, 2018 Survey Adaptability (Usability AND flexibility) OR "Suitability for individualization" "software tools" Bevan et al, 2016;Rahayu et al, 2018 Generate/ Assign Groups "software tool" assignment groups Balderas et al, 2018;Restrepo-Calle et al, 2019 Question type "question type" importance software tool Iqbal et al, 2016;Lucia et al, 2009 Restrictions of score -- Luaces et al, 2017;Vossen, 2018 Mailing notifications "mail notification" software tool Iqbal et al, 2016;Lucia et al, 2009 Weighting "weight marks" software Wahid et al, 2017;Singh et al, 2016;Alturki, 2016 Display Results -- Wahid et al, 2017 Reports "automatic report" software tool Hicks et al, 2018;Hyung et al, 2003;Safdari et al, 2016;Bauriaud et al, 2018;Raza et al, n.d Consequently, it is important to analyse the other parameters since they have discrepancies between them. Having stated that, none of the tools has implemented the "Restricted Scales" parameter.…”
Section: Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%